Sequence-Based Mutation Analysis Hemochromatosis

From Bioinformatikpedia
Revision as of 10:45, 17 June 2012 by Joerdensv (talk | contribs) (MSA conservation)

Hemochromatosis>>Task 6: Sequence-based mutation analysis


Riddle of the Task

Coming soon... or later...


Short task description

Detailed description: Sequence-based mutation analysis


Protocol

A protocol with a description of the data acquisition and other scripts used for this task is available here.


SNPs

From MSUD: M35T V53M G93R Q127H A162S L183P T217I R224W E277K C282S


Amino acid features

<figtable id="TODO_ID">

Mutation Hydrophobicity (wt) Hydrophobicity (mt) Polarity (wt) Polarity (mt) pI (wt) pI (mt) v.d.W. volume (wt) v.d.W. volume (mt)
M35T 1.9 -0.7 nonpolar polar 5.74 5.60 124 93
V53M 4.2 1.9 nonpolar nonpolar 6.00 5.74 105 124
G93R -0.4 -4.5 nonpolar polar 6.06 10.76 48 148
Q127H -3.5 -3.2 polar polar 5.65 7.60 114 118
A162S 1.8 -0.8 nonpolar polar 6.01 5.68 67 73
L183P 3.8 -1.6 nonpolar nonpolar 6.01 6.30 124 90
T217I -0.7 4.5 polar nonpolar 5.60 6.05 93 124
R224W -4.5 -0.9 polar nonpolar 10.76 5.89 148 163
E277K -3.5 -3.9 polar polar 3.15 9.60 109 135
C282S 2.5 -0.8 polar polar 5.05 5.68 86 73
TODO: description.

</figtable>


Evolutionary analysis


BLOSUM62/PAM1/PAM250

<figtable id="TODO_ID">

Mutation BLOSUM62 PAM1 PAM250
M35T -1 6 500
V53M 1 4 200
G93R -2 0 200
Q127H 0 20 700
A162S 1 28 900
L183P -3 2 300
T217I -1 7 400
R224W -3 2 200
E277K 1 7 800
C282S -1 11 700
TODO: description.

</figtable>



PSSM

The complete matrix can be found here.

The given table provides the following data: <figtable id="TODO_ID">

Mutation wt mt
PSSM-value frequency PSSM-value frequency
M35T 3 16% 5 78%
V53M 5 99% 1 1%
G93R 3 29% -2 1%
Q127H 2 16% -2 0%
A162S 5 100% 1 0%
L183P 4 95% -3 0%
T217I 2 16% -2 0%
R224W 6 100% -3 0%
E277K 6 100% 0 0%
C282S 10 100% -1 0%
TODO: description.

</figtable>

These values lead to our following conclusions:


M35T would not be predicted as a disease causing mutation as the mutant is occuring frequently.

V53M would most probably be predicted as a disease causing mutation, because the mutant type occurs more often than expected. Another evidence is the high wildtype conservation at this position. The only thing that does not fit the prediction is, that the mutation is seen more often than expected, which could be a sign of a non-disease-causing mutation.

G93R is hard to predict based on the given numbers, as the wildtype is not very conserved with 29%, but because the mutation gets a value of -2 (meaning the occurrence of this mutation is fewer than expected) this position is more likely to be disease causing. In total, 7 different amino acids were observed at this position (A, R, D, E, G, T, V).

Q127H, predicted by only the conservation of wild type and mutation would be quite difficult. The conclusion would be that (like for G93R) the position is disease causing because the mutant type occurrence is lower than expected. Another fact supporting this prediction is, that only 3 different amino acids are observed at position 127 (Q, E, G), which might be an indicator of the importance of this position for the protein.

A162S would be predicted as a disease causing mutation, based on the 100% conservation of the wild type.

L183P would be predicted as a disease causing mutation, based on the wildtype conservation (95%) and the low frequency of occurence (lower than expected) of the mutated position).

T217I is another difficult prediction case when only looking at wildtype and mutation type conservation. Probably it would be predicted as disease causing because of the lower-than-expected frequency of the mutant type. Another supporting fact for this prediction is, that only two amino acids were observed at that position, meaning the sequence is fairly conserved.

R224W would be predicted as a disease causing mutation because of the high wildtype conservation (100%), supported by the lower than expected frequency of the mutant type.

E277K would be predicted as a disease causing mutation because of the high wildtype conservation (100%).

C282S would be predicted as a disease causing mutation because of the high wildtype conservation (100%), supported by the lower than expected frequency of the mutant type.



MSA conservation

The following Table TODO has been retrieved through the MSAs of the HFE-sequence and homologs (found via PSIBlast). The MSAs can be seen here (Muscle MSA) and here (ClustalW MSA).

<figtable id="TODO_ID">

Mutation Muscle Clustal
conservation score consensus consensus percentage conservation score consensus consensus percentage
M35T 10 T 98% 10 T 98%
V53M 10 V 99% 10 V 99%
G93R 5 A 58% 5 A 58%
Q127H 10 V 99% 10 V 99%
A162S 11 A 100% 11 A 100%
L183P 9 L 92% 9 L 92%
T217I 10 S 99% 10 S 99%
R224W 11 R 100% 11 R 100%
E277K 10 E 99% 10 E 99%
C282S 11 C 100% 11 C 100%
TODO: description.

</figtable>


The multiple sequence alignments give the numbers in table TODO.

The predictions on these informations would be:

M35T: not disease causing (as the consensus in 98% of the positions T occurs)

V53M: disease causing

Q127H: disease causing

A162S: disease causing

L183P: disease causing

T217I: disease causing

R224W: disease causing

E277K: disease causing

C282S: disease causing

M35T

  • Secondary structure assignment: sheet
SEQ (mt):     LRSHSLHYLFTGASEQDLGLS
DSSP (wt):     CCEEEEEEEEEEECCCCCCE
PsiPred (wt): CCCCCCCEEEEEEECCCCCCC
PsiPred (mt): CCCCCCCEEEEEEECCCCCCC

<figtable id="M35T_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


V53M

  • Secondary structure assignment: sheet
SEQ (mt):     GLSLFEALGYMDDQLFVFYDH
DSSP (wt):    CCECCEEEEEECCEEEEEEEC
PsiPred (wt): CCCEEEEEEEECCEEEEEEEC
PsiPred (mt): CCCEEEEEEEECCEEEEEEEC

<figtable id="V53M_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


G93R

  • Secondary structure assignment: helix
SEQ (mt):     MWLQLSQSLKRWDHMFTVDFW
DSSP (wt):    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
PsiPred (wt): HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
PsiPred (mt): HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

<figtable id="G93R_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


Q127H

  • Secondary structure assignment: coil
SEQ (mt):     TLQVILGCEMHEDNSTEGYWK
DSSP (wt):    EEEEEEEEEECCCCCEEEEEE
PsiPred (wt): EEEEECCCCCCCCCCCCCEEE
PsiPred (mt): CEEEECCCEECCCCCCCCCCE

<figtable id="Q127H_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


A162S

  • Secondary structure assignment: helix
SEQ (mt):     TLDWRAAEPRSWPTKLEWERH
DSSP (wt):    HCEEEECCHHHHHHHHHHHCC
PsiPred (wt): CCCEECCCCCHHHHHHHHHHH
PsiPred (mt): CCCEECCCCCHHHHHHHHHHH

<figtable id="A162S_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


L183P

  • Secondary structure assignment: helix (trusting DSSP)
SEQ (mt):     KIRARQNRAYPERDCPAQLQQ
DSSP (wt):    CHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
PsiPred (wt): HHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHH
PsiPred (mt): HHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHH

<figtable id="L183P_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


T217I

  • Secondary structure assignment: coil
SEQ (mt):     PPLVKVTHHVISSVTTLRCRA
DSSP (wt):    CCEEEEEEEECCCCEEEEEEE
PsiPred (wt): CCCEEEECCCCCCCCEEEEEE
PsiPred (mt): CCCEEEECCCCCCCCEEEEEE

<figtable id="T217I_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


R224W

  • Secondary structure assignment: sheet
SEQ (mt):     HHVTSSVTTLWCRALNYYPQN
DSSP (wt):    EEECCCCEEEEEEEEEEECCC
PsiPred (wt): CCCCCCCCEEEEEECCCCCCC
PsiPred (mt): CCCCCCCCEEEEEECCCCCCC

<figtable id="R224W_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


E277K

  • Secondary structure assignment: helix (trusting DSSP)
SEQ (mt):     WITLAVPPGEKQRYTCQVEHP
DSSP (wt):    EEEEEECCCHHHHEEEEEECC
PsiPred (wt): EEEEEECCCCCCCEEEEEECC
PsiPred (mt): EEEEEECCCCCCCEEEEEECC

<figtable id="E277K_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


C282S

  • Secondary structure assignment: sheet
SEQ (mt):     VPPGEEQRYTSQVEHPGLDQP
DSSP (wt):    ECCCHHHHEEEEEECCCCCCC
PsiPred (wt): ECCCCCCCEEEEEECCCCCCC
PsiPred (mt): ECCCCCCCCEEEEECCCCCCC

<figtable id="C282S_pymol">

Wildtype.
Mutant.
Table TODO: ...

</figtable>


References

<references/>