Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-Based Mutation Analysis Hemochromatosis"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Created page with "@PKU (who I think review us this week):<br> I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amoun…")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
@PKU (who I think review us this week):<br>
 
@PKU (who I think review us this week):<br>
 
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^
 
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^
  +
  +
*You could have left out the non-relevant rows of the PSSM also. :-P.<br/> No, I think it is very good as it is, nothing to say, really. Maybe a weighting of the methods would improve your results, and I personally think that e.g. the PAM-score is not as significant as a ' proper ' prediction, but I don't have a handy weighting scheme either and understand your decision. Out of curiosity (didn't do it ourselves): How long does SNAP need to make all ~6000 predictions?
  +
[[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:18, 18 June 2012

@PKU (who I think review us this week):
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^

  • You could have left out the non-relevant rows of the PSSM also. :-P.
    No, I think it is very good as it is, nothing to say, really. Maybe a weighting of the methods would improve your results, and I personally think that e.g. the PAM-score is not as significant as a ' proper ' prediction, but I don't have a handy weighting scheme either and understand your decision. Out of curiosity (didn't do it ourselves): How long does SNAP need to make all ~6000 predictions?

Boidolj 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)