Task 9: Structure-based mutation analysis

From Bioinformatikpedia
Revision as of 23:35, 25 August 2013 by Betza (talk | contribs)

<css> table.colBasic2 { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 1px solid black; border-collapse:collapse; width: 40%; }

.colBasic2 th,td { padding: 3px; border: 1px solid black; }

.colBasic2 td { text-align:left; }

/* for orange try #ff7f00 and #ffaa56 for blue try #005fbf and #aad4ff

maria's style blue: #adceff grey: #efefef

  • /

.colBasic2 tr th { background-color:#efefef; color: black;} .colBasic2 tr:first-child th { background-color:#adceff; color:black;} </css>

PDB ID Res [A] R-value (obs) pH missing residues coverage
1A6Z 2.60 2.33 6.5 1-3 83.4%
1DE4 2.80 2.31 8.0 1-3 83.4%

Lab_Journal_Hemochromatosis_Task9

Structure Selection

From the two available structures, we chose 1A6Z, because it has a slightly higher resolution and a nearly identical resolution compared to 1DE4. On the downside, 1A6Z was resolved at a pH value of 6.5, which is more distant to the physiological pH than the resolution pH of 1DE4. 1A6Z was chosen nevertheless, because it was used in all previous tasks, in order to keep consistency.

Mutations

Mutation Disease causing ?
Val53Met Yes
His63Asp Yes
Met97Ile No
Thr217Ile No
Cys282Tyr Yes

<figtable id="mut_overview">

Mut 1 lab.png
Mut 2 lab.png

</figtable>

Structure Mutation using SCWRL

Val53Met

<figtable id="53_mut">

53 wt.png
53 mut.png
Figure 2: Wild type(grey) and mutant(red) residues for position 53.

</figtable> Figure 2 shows that the mutation to Methionin does not change the polar contacts of the residue. But Methionin extends further into the binding pocket than Valin, which might disturb the structure of the binding pocket and inhibit the binding process.

His63Asp

<figtable id="63_mut">

63 wt.png
63 mut.png
Figure 3: Wild type(grey) and mutant(red) residues for position 63.

Met97Ile

<figtable id="63_mut">

97 wt.png
97 mut.png
Figure 4: Wild type(grey) and mutant(red) residues for position 97.

T217I

<figtable id="63_mut">

217 wt.png
217 mut.png
Figure 5: Wild type(grey) and mutant(red) residues for position 217.

C282Y

Structure Mutation using foldX

Minimisation

Method Mutation Iter. 1 Iter. 2 Iter. 3 Iter. 4 Iter. 5
WT - -3724.15 -5003.51 -5118.38 -5198.32 -5301.44
scwrl V53M -5022.73 -5295.74 -5154.72 -5272.51 -5260.4
H63D -4940.57 -5212.88 -5084.45 -5190.74 -5189.68
M97I -5025.31 -5291.5 -5146.59 -5247.72 -5246.2
T217I -5037.72 -5307.97 -5171.54 -5277.0 -5269.32
C282Y -2596.78 -5107.77 -5037.12 -5159.07 -5191.73
foldx 1a6z_a_1 -5323.9 -5544.42 -5450.03 -5377.19 -5436.94
1a6z_a_2 -5284.49 -5493.82 -5437.69 -5364.69 -5454.72
1a6z_a_3 -5264.67 -5482.17 -5405.78 -5343.15 -5255.85
1a6z_a_4 -5275.89 -5492.39 -5416.59 -5343.98 -5431.55
1a6z_a_5 -3376.95 -5217.05 -5194.04 -5231.15 -5290.49