Difference between revisions of "Structure-based mutation analysis (Phenylketonuria)"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Preparation)
(Preparation)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
[[Lab Journal - Task 9 (PAH) |Lab journal]] <br>
 
[[Lab Journal - Task 9 (PAH) |Lab journal]] <br>
   
In the further analysis we used the protein structure of [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2PAH 2PAH] for the analysis. Now, we will use [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1J8U 1J8U] since this structure got better results for the following observed constraints:
+
In some Tasks before, we used the protein structure of [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2PAH 2PAH] as reference, but now we have to check some more constraints for the protein structure selection:
 
* Structure with the highest resolution (small Å value)
 
* Structure with the highest resolution (small Å value)
 
* Smallest R-factor
 
* Smallest R-factor
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* No gaps (missing residues) included in the structure, so a consecutive numbering of residues should be given
 
* No gaps (missing residues) included in the structure, so a consecutive numbering of residues should be given
   
To proof our statement, the results of the constraints of 2PAH and 1J8U are compared in the Table below.
+
To check which protein structure to use for further analysis, we compared the terms of the constraints for all sequences given in the PAH ([http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/P00439 P00439]) Uniprot entry in Table x below:
 
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center" style="text-align:center"
 
{|border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" align="center" style="text-align:center"
 
|-
 
|-
Line 57: Line 57:
 
| 6PAH || 2.15 || 0.17 || 6.80 || x || A || 117-424 || x
 
| 6PAH || 2.15 || 0.17 || 6.80 || x || A || 117-424 || x
 
|}
 
|}
  +
In Table x we can see, that the protein [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1J8U 1J8U] has a better resolution value as well as R-factor than the other proteins...
   
 
== Energy comparisons ==
 
== Energy comparisons ==

Revision as of 17:52, 2 July 2013

Page still under construction!!!

Summary

...

Preparation

Lab journal

In some Tasks before, we used the protein structure of 2PAH as reference, but now we have to check some more constraints for the protein structure selection:

  • Structure with the highest resolution (small Å value)
  • Smallest R-factor
  • Highest coverage
  • pH-value ideally near physiological pH of 7.4
  • No gaps (missing residues) included in the structure, so a consecutive numbering of residues should be given

To check which protein structure to use for further analysis, we compared the terms of the constraints for all sequences given in the PAH (P00439) Uniprot entry in Table x below:

Protein Resolution(Å) R-factor pH gaps chain Positions in P00439 Coverage %
1DMW 2.00 0.20 6.80 x A 118-424 x
1J8T 1.70 0.20 6.80 x A 103-427 x
1J8U 1.50 0.16 6.80 0 A 103-427 71.68
1KW0 2.50 0.22 6.80 x A 103-427 x
1LRM 2.10 0.21 6.80 x A 103-427 x
1MMK 2.00 0.20 6.80 x A 103-427 x
1MMT 2.00 0.21 6.80 x A 103-427 x
1PAH 2.00 0.18 6.80 x A 117-424 x
1TDW 2.10 0.21 6.80 x A 117-424 x
1TG2 2.20 0.21 6.80 x A 117-424 x
2PAH 3.10 0.25 7.00 x A/B 118-452 73.89
3PAH 2.00 0.18 6.80 x A 117-424 x
4ANP 2.11 0.20 6.80 x A 104-427 x
4PAH 2.00 0.17 6.80 x A 117-424 x
5PAH 2.10 0.16 6.80 x A 117-424 x
6PAH 2.15 0.17 6.80 x A 117-424 x

In Table x we can see, that the protein 1J8U has a better resolution value as well as R-factor than the other proteins...

Energy comparisons

...

FoldX

...

Minimise

...

References

<references/>