Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-Based Mutation Analysis Hemochromatosis"
From Bioinformatikpedia
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^ |
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^ |
||
| − | *You could have left out the non-relevant rows of the PSSM also. :-P.<br/> No, I think it is very good as it is, |
+ | *You could have left out the non-relevant rows of the PSSM also. :-P.<br/> No, I think it is very good as it is, very little to say, really. The big pictures of the alignment are a little.. overwhelming and there might be redundant sequences in the alignment (hard to check). Maybe a weighting of the methods would improve your results, and I personally think that e.g. the PAM-score is not as significant as a ' proper ' prediction, but I don't have a handy weighting scheme either and understand your decision. Out of curiosity (didn't do it ourselves): How long does SNAP need to make all ~6000 predictions? |
| + | |||
| + | *differ in most predictions ''but'' --> differ in most ''except/but for''<br/>The to be analysed mutations are highlighted. --> The mutations to be analysed are highlighted.<br/> I think. |
||
| + | |||
[[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:34, 18 June 2012
@PKU (who I think review us this week):
I've tried to keep the DSSP/PsiPred prediction section short as I know you don't like too much "raw output" on the wiki. Is this amount okay with you?^^
- You could have left out the non-relevant rows of the PSSM also. :-P.
No, I think it is very good as it is, very little to say, really. The big pictures of the alignment are a little.. overwhelming and there might be redundant sequences in the alignment (hard to check). Maybe a weighting of the methods would improve your results, and I personally think that e.g. the PAM-score is not as significant as a ' proper ' prediction, but I don't have a handy weighting scheme either and understand your decision. Out of curiosity (didn't do it ourselves): How long does SNAP need to make all ~6000 predictions?
- differ in most predictions but --> differ in most except/but for
The to be analysed mutations are highlighted. --> The mutations to be analysed are highlighted.
I think.
Boidolj 18:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
