Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabry:Homology based structure predictions"
From Bioinformatikpedia
Bernhoferm (talk | contribs) |
Staniewski (talk | contribs) (→Feeback) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Just finished your wiki. I like how you structured your wiki (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right). Sometimes I felt a little bit overwhelmed by the mass of tables. It was easy to understand and the spelling errors I found are listed below. I also really liked your approach with the variation of the active site alignments. --[[User:Bernhoferm|Bernhoferm]] 11:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
Just finished your wiki. I like how you structured your wiki (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right). Sometimes I felt a little bit overwhelmed by the mass of tables. It was easy to understand and the spelling errors I found are listed below. I also really liked your approach with the variation of the active site alignments. --[[User:Bernhoferm|Bernhoferm]] 11:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | : > (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right) |
||
| + | : Thanks, that's fixed. The wiki does not seem to like when you go deeper than three headline levels. [[User:Staniewski|Staniewski]] 12:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Spelling errors == |
== Spelling errors == |
||
Revision as of 13:39, 4 June 2012
Feeback
Just finished your wiki. I like how you structured your wiki (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right). Sometimes I felt a little bit overwhelmed by the mass of tables. It was easy to understand and the spelling errors I found are listed below. I also really liked your approach with the variation of the active site alignments. --Bernhoferm 11:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- > (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right)
- Thanks, that's fixed. The wiki does not seem to like when you go deeper than three headline levels. Staniewski 12:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Spelling errors
- "In most of the cases..." better would be "In most cases..."
- "...we observe a slightly worse DOPE score a really bad Compactness value." missing "...DOPE score AND a really..."
- "MULTI 3 is considered nearly perfect, since its TM-score is only little less than 1." I guess you meant MULTI 1.
- "Comparing the local modal quality estimation of this model..." I guess "modal" should be "model".
Sorry for not listing where exactly they are, but STRG+F should be able to find them.
