Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabry:Homology based structure predictions"

From Bioinformatikpedia
m (Created page with "right")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:FABRY_Kritik.jpg|right]]
  
[[File:FABRY_Kritik.jpg|right]]
  +
  +
  +
== Feeback ==
  +
  +
Just finished your wiki. I like how you structured your wiki (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right). Sometimes I felt a little bit overwhelmed by the mass of tables. It was easy to understand and the spelling errors I found are listed below. I also really liked your approach with the variation of the active site alignments. --[[User:Bernhoferm|Bernhoferm]] 11:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Spelling errors ==
  +
  +
* "In most of the cases..." better would be "In most cases..."
  +
* "...we observe a slightly worse DOPE score a really bad Compactness value." missing "...DOPE score AND a really..."
  +
* "MULTI 3 is considered nearly perfect, since its TM-score is only little less than 1." I guess you meant MULTI 1.
  +
* "Comparing the local '''modal''' quality estimation of this model..." I guess "modal" should be "model".
  +
  +
Sorry for not listing where exactly they are, but STRG+F should be able to find them.

Revision as of 12:01, 4 June 2012

FABRY Kritik.jpg


Feeback

Just finished your wiki. I like how you structured your wiki (although my "list of contents" looks a bit strange as everything after and including SwissModel seems to be shifted one step to the right). Sometimes I felt a little bit overwhelmed by the mass of tables. It was easy to understand and the spelling errors I found are listed below. I also really liked your approach with the variation of the active site alignments. --Bernhoferm 11:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Spelling errors

  • "In most of the cases..." better would be "In most cases..."
  • "...we observe a slightly worse DOPE score a really bad Compactness value." missing "...DOPE score AND a really..."
  • "MULTI 3 is considered nearly perfect, since its TM-score is only little less than 1." I guess you meant MULTI 1.
  • "Comparing the local modal quality estimation of this model..." I guess "modal" should be "model".

Sorry for not listing where exactly they are, but STRG+F should be able to find them.

Retrieved from "https://i12r-studfilesrv.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Fabry:Homology_based_structure_predictions&oldid=21253"