Difference between revisions of "Hemochromatosis"
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
DSSP: http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/ |
DSSP: http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/ |
||
SOV:http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/files/Lehre/PRK_GoBi/material/home/Literatur/ZemlaVFR99.pdf |
SOV:http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/files/Lehre/PRK_GoBi/material/home/Literatur/ZemlaVFR99.pdf |
||
+ | <br> |
||
− | <math>Q_3 = /frac{correct predictions}{all predictions} = frac{TP+FP}{TP + TN + FP + FN}</math> |
||
+ | <math> Q_3 = \frac{correct predictions}{all predictions} = \frac{TP+FP}{TP + TN + FP + FN} </math> |
||
− | |||
+ | <br> |
||
{| style="text-align: center; border-collapse: collapse; border: 1px solid #000" |
{| style="text-align: center; border-collapse: collapse; border: 1px solid #000" |
||
!colspan="16" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px 0px 1px 0px"|Prediction methods |
!colspan="16" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0px 0px 1px 0px"|Prediction methods |
Revision as of 17:45, 29 May 2013
Secondary Structure
In this task, secondary structure of proteins is predicted using the programs reProf and PsiPred. The results are then compared to the DSSP secondary structure assignments from corresponding crystal structures in the PDB. Thus, the following crystal structures were selected for comparison. The first priority for selection was to get the protein in its native state and not bound to another molecule. The other criteria were the quality of the structure and the alignment to the protein sequence(having one continous segment).
Uniprot | PDB | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UID | Name | Length | ID | Resolution | Chain | Length |
Q30201 | Hereditary hemochromatosis protein | 348 | A16Z | 2.60 | A | 275 |
P10775 | Ribonuclease inhibitor | 456 | 2BNH | 2.30 | A | 457 |
Q9X0E6 | Divalent-cation tolerance protein CutA | 101 | 1VHF | 1.54 | A | 113 |
Q08209 | CAM-PRP catalytic subunit | 521 | 1M63 | 2.80 | A | 372 |
In the next step, the output of the prediction programs and the DSSP assignments have to be made comparable. DSSP assigns 8 different classes of secondary structure, whereas reProf and PsiPred only predict helix(H), sheet(E) and loop(L or C). Therefore, H and G are mapped to H, E to E and all other DSSP classes to C.
DSSP: http://swift.cmbi.ru.nl/gv/dssp/
SOV:http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/files/Lehre/PRK_GoBi/material/home/Literatur/ZemlaVFR99.pdf
<math> Q_3 = \frac{correct predictions}{all predictions} = \frac{TP+FP}{TP + TN + FP + FN} </math>
Prediction methods | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reprof + Sequence | Reprof + Big80 | Reprof + SwissProt | Reprof + PDB | Psipred | |||||||||||
Q3 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.84 | ||||||||||
SOV3 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.73 | ||||||||||
Acc | Cov | F1 | Acc | Cov | F1 | Acc | Cov | F1 | Acc | Cov | F1 | Acc | Cov | F1 | |
H | 0.63 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.74 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.98 | 0.77 | 0.86 |
C | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.95 | 0.74 |
E | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.55 | 0.69 |
Protein | Method | Q3 | SOV3 |
---|---|---|---|
Q08209 | ReProf | 0.83 | 0.78 |
Psipred | 0.87 | 0.79 | |
Q30201 | ReProf | 0.86 | 0.84 |
Psipred | 0.84 | 0.73 | |
P10775 | ReProf | 0.91 | 0.93 |
Psipred | 0.93 | 0.94 | |
Q9X0E6 | ReProf | 0.75 | 0.65 |
Psipred | 0.89 | 0.86 |