Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabry:Sequence alignments (sequence searches and multiple alignments)/Journal"
m (Created page with "I noticed you set "<code>-v 700 -b 700</code>". Is that enough to catch all hits up to the e-value limits? -- read the Task_alignments#Sequence_searches carefully... ;-) --…") |
Staniewski (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Fabry:Sequence alignments (sequence searches and multiple alignments):Journal to Talk:Fabry:Sequence alignments (sequence searches and multiple alignments)/Journal) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I noticed you set "<code>-v 700 -b 700</code>". Is that enough to catch all hits up to the e-value limits? -- read the [[Task_alignments#Sequence_searches]] carefully... ;-) -- [[User:Andrea|andrea]] 10:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
I noticed you set "<code>-v 700 -b 700</code>". Is that enough to catch all hits up to the e-value limits? -- read the [[Task_alignments#Sequence_searches]] carefully... ;-) -- [[User:Andrea|andrea]] 10:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | I actually thought it would be enough, since the instruction says "no more relevant hits are found." But maybe I misunderstood. What does relevant hit mean? --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | We have the same problem. From the sentence cited by Julia we assumed we should set this constraint in a way that the returned hits end at an evalue that we would consider a maximum for relevant hits. This seems a bit strange since it comes down to setting an evalue threshold but that is the only senseful interpretation that came to our mind. --[[User:reeb|reebj]] 16:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 17:06, 9 May 2012
I noticed you set "-v 700 -b 700". Is that enough to catch all hits up to the e-value limits? -- read the Task_alignments#Sequence_searches carefully... ;-) -- andrea 10:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I actually thought it would be enough, since the instruction says "no more relevant hits are found." But maybe I misunderstood. What does relevant hit mean? --Rackersederj 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
We have the same problem. From the sentence cited by Julia we assumed we should set this constraint in a way that the returned hits end at an evalue that we would consider a maximum for relevant hits. This seems a bit strange since it comes down to setting an evalue threshold but that is the only senseful interpretation that came to our mind. --reebj 16:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
