Difference between revisions of "Talk:Normal Mode Analysis (PKU)"
From Bioinformatikpedia
Bernhoferm (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Feedback: It's a pitty that you didn't have a structure with a different conformation, but you tried to do as much as you could with your given data. I don't know if your finishe…") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Feedback: |
Feedback: |
||
| − | It's a pitty that you didn't have a structure with a different conformation, but you tried to do as much as you could with your given data. I don't know if your finished with this task or not, but at least the ElNemo section could use a bit more text (a bit more detail on the modes; what could cause the inversion). Other than that I liked your entry. It was brief, you always tried to make sense of the motions (in the WEBnm@ section at least). --[[User:Bernhoferm|Bernhoferm]] |
+ | It's a pitty that you didn't have a structure with a different conformation, but you tried to do as much as you could with your given data. I don't know if your finished with this task or not, but at least the ElNemo section could use a bit more text (a bit more detail on the modes; what could cause the inversion). Other than that I liked your entry. It was brief, you always tried to make sense of the motions (in the WEBnm@ section at least). --[[User:Bernhoferm|Bernhoferm]] 13:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC) |
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* "...to describe a proteins motions." -> "a protein's motions". |
* "...to describe a proteins motions." -> "a protein's motions". |
||
* "...we get an overlap of the high frequence modes..." Do you really mean the high freq modes? Not the low freq ones. |
* "...we get an overlap of the high frequence modes..." Do you really mean the high freq modes? Not the low freq ones. |
||
| + | ** I meant the higher (~90) frequency modes, yes. This is really only a tiny change, not a conformational one, the low frequency modes are large movements. |
||
* "...there is no clear tendence to be found..." -> "tendency". |
* "...there is no clear tendence to be found..." -> "tendency". |
||
* "...but the structure is moved changed quite a bit..." -> remove either "moved" or "changed". |
* "...but the structure is moved changed quite a bit..." -> remove either "moved" or "changed". |
||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | New: |
||
| + | * Figure 36 and 37 have the same caption text. Both with the same error "...C-terminal binding domain is '''ound''' in the upper left...". |
||
| + | * In the ElNemo fluctuation plots you talk about "red and green dots", but they are "red and blue" ;) |
||
| + | **meh -.- |
||
Latest revision as of 17:31, 31 July 2012
Feedback: It's a pitty that you didn't have a structure with a different conformation, but you tried to do as much as you could with your given data. I don't know if your finished with this task or not, but at least the ElNemo section could use a bit more text (a bit more detail on the modes; what could cause the inversion). Other than that I liked your entry. It was brief, you always tried to make sense of the motions (in the WEBnm@ section at least). --Bernhoferm 13:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Spelling errors:
- "We will calculate visualize large coordinate movements..." Missing an "and".
- "...the protein is modeled as harmonically oscillating system..." -> "as A harmonically".
- "...to describe a proteins motions." -> "a protein's motions".
- "...we get an overlap of the high frequence modes..." Do you really mean the high freq modes? Not the low freq ones.
- I meant the higher (~90) frequency modes, yes. This is really only a tiny change, not a conformational one, the low frequency modes are large movements.
- "...there is no clear tendence to be found..." -> "tendency".
- "...but the structure is moved changed quite a bit..." -> remove either "moved" or "changed".
New:
- Figure 36 and 37 have the same caption text. Both with the same error "...C-terminal binding domain is ound in the upper left...".
- In the ElNemo fluctuation plots you talk about "red and green dots", but they are "red and blue" ;)
- meh -.-
