Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-Based Predictions Hemochromatosis"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→Suggestions) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Suggestions== |
==Suggestions== |
||
− | * sequences should not be bigger than the size of the window (for latex user: warning: bad box [[Sequence- |
+ | * sequences should not be bigger than the size of the window (for latex user: warning: bad box [[Sequence-Based_Predictions_Hemochromatosis#1KR4|table]] x pts to big) |
− | ** plus i really think the sequences like this are rather supplementary data and should just be linked and rather visualized than pasted |
+ | ** plus i really think the sequences like this are rather supplementary data and should just be linked and rather visualized than pasted |
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Hollizeck|Hollizeck]] 20:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | *sometimes I think you are too short at the expense of precision. E.g in the ''Disorder'' section: "although IUPred inserts a small ordered region at the end of the protein." you're talking -I guess- about the 374-4xx region in Q08209. I couldn't spot it without looking in DisProt directly so a more detailed description would have been nice. |
||
+ | *In the ''GoPet'' section you call the two predicted terms correct, yet they do not appear in QuickGo (which you kind of somehow hint at, yes.. see above ;)) |
||
+ | * altogether very readable and concise. I like the clear organisation and style. |
||
+ | [[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 22:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:41, 21 May 2012
Suggestions
- sequences should not be bigger than the size of the window (for latex user: warning: bad box table x pts to big)
- plus i really think the sequences like this are rather supplementary data and should just be linked and rather visualized than pasted
--Hollizeck 20:33, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- sometimes I think you are too short at the expense of precision. E.g in the Disorder section: "although IUPred inserts a small ordered region at the end of the protein." you're talking -I guess- about the 374-4xx region in Q08209. I couldn't spot it without looking in DisProt directly so a more detailed description would have been nice.
- In the GoPet section you call the two predicted terms correct, yet they do not appear in QuickGo (which you kind of somehow hint at, yes.. see above ;))
- altogether very readable and concise. I like the clear organisation and style.
Boidolj 22:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)