Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabry:Sequence alignments (sequence searches and multiple alignments)/Journal"

From Bioinformatikpedia
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
I actually thought it would be enough, since the instruction says "no more relevant hits are found." But maybe I misunderstood. What does relevant hit mean? --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
  
I actually thought it would be enough, since the instruction says "no more relevant hits are found." But maybe I misunderstood. What does relevant hit mean? --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
We have the same problem. From the sentence cited by Julia we assumed we should set this constraint in a way that the returned hits end at an evalue that we would consider a maximum for relevant hits. This seems a bit strange since it comes down to setting an evalue threshold but that is the only senseful interpretation that came to our mind. --[[User:reeb|reebj]] 16:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:06, 9 May 2012

I noticed you set "-v 700 -b 700". Is that enough to catch all hits up to the e-value limits? -- read the Task_alignments#Sequence_searches carefully... ;-) -- andrea 10:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

I actually thought it would be enough, since the instruction says "no more relevant hits are found." But maybe I misunderstood. What does relevant hit mean? --Rackersederj 14:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

We have the same problem. From the sentence cited by Julia we assumed we should set this constraint in a way that the returned hits end at an evalue that we would consider a maximum for relevant hits. This seems a bit strange since it comes down to setting an evalue threshold but that is the only senseful interpretation that came to our mind. --reebj 16:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://i12r-studfilesrv.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Fabry:Sequence_alignments_(sequence_searches_and_multiple_alignments)/Journal&oldid=18663"