Difference between revisions of "Talk:Structure-based mutation analysis (PKU)"
From Bioinformatikpedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This is just a place to add criticism and or positive feedback so we [[User:Boidolj|Jonathan]] and [[User:Hollizeck|Sebastian]] have a possibility to improve. Please note, that we wont be able to adress all matters immediately but we will address them eventually! |
||
| − | Just noticed that you used charmm27. When you use this force field the output from g energy misses angles. Also the number of the potential attribute is shifted 1 is Bond, 2 is "U-B" and 12 is "dont know right now". The potential is number 13. Im not sure what exactly U-B is but i think angle would be given when choosing the attributes[[User:Joerdensv|Joerdensv]] |
||
| + | [[File:Example.jpg|400px|thumb|topright|alt=schematic group of people coloured in several colours with speech bubbles above their head| source: [http://www.rmcdocs.com/images/DiscussionForum.jpg]]] |
||
| + | ==criticism== |
||
| + | <!-- Please edit here is you got urgent matters --> |
||
| + | ==positive feedback== |
||
| − | Ahead of you: Fixed the potential energy, still trying to figure out the "angle" option. Thx anyway! |
||
| + | <!-- tell us what you like here --> |
||
| − | [[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 14:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ==suggestions== |
||
| + | <!-- when you think there is something you should read here is the place and time --> |
||
| + | |||
| + | == urgent matters == |
||
| + | Just noticed that you used charmm27. When you use this force field the output from g energy misses angles. Also the number of the potential attribute is shifted 1 is Bond, 2 is "U-B" and 12 is "dont know right now". The potential is number 13. Im not sure what exactly U-B is but i think angle would be given when choosing the attributes [[User:Joerdensv|Joerdensv]] |
||
| + | *Ahead of you: Fixed the potential energy, still trying to figure out the "angle" option. Thx anyway! [[User:Boidolj|Boidolj]] 14:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:15, 24 June 2012
This is just a place to add criticism and or positive feedback so we Jonathan and Sebastian have a possibility to improve. Please note, that we wont be able to adress all matters immediately but we will address them eventually!
source: [1]
criticism
positive feedback
suggestions
urgent matters
Just noticed that you used charmm27. When you use this force field the output from g energy misses angles. Also the number of the potential attribute is shifted 1 is Bond, 2 is "U-B" and 12 is "dont know right now". The potential is number 13. Im not sure what exactly U-B is but i think angle would be given when choosing the attributes Joerdensv
- Ahead of you: Fixed the potential energy, still trying to figure out the "angle" option. Thx anyway! Boidolj 14:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
![[1]](http://www.rmcdocs.com/images/DiscussionForum.jpg){kind=link}