Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canavan Task 7 - Structure-based mutation analysis"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(Created page with "Hi, I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams wh…") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hi, |
Hi, |
||
I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable. |
I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable. |
||
− | In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the |
+ | In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the 305 mutation bar is missing. its in the text, but somebody just casual reading (looking at the pictures :P). |
I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine |
I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine |
||
Latest revision as of 08:04, 26 June 2012
Hi, I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable. In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the 305 mutation bar is missing. its in the text, but somebody just casual reading (looking at the pictures :P). I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine
--Wagnerr 07:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)