Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canavan Task 7 - Structure-based mutation analysis"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Created page with "Hi, I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams wh…")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Hi,
 
Hi,
 
I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable.
 
I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable.
In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the 204 mutation bar is missing. its in the text, but somebody just casual reading (looking at the pictures :P).
+
In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the 305 mutation bar is missing. its in the text, but somebody just casual reading (looking at the pictures :P).
 
I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine
 
I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine
   

Latest revision as of 09:04, 26 June 2012

Hi, I what i liked most about your page is that it is really well layed out and thereby easy to read. you don't spam tables (like we do :P) but instead use images and diagrams whenever it seems applicable. In Figure 24 I feel that you should mention why the 305 mutation bar is missing. its in the text, but somebody just casual reading (looking at the pictures :P). I somehow miss the conclusion listing which snps you consider deleterious after the task, but other that that your fine

--Wagnerr 07:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)