Gaucher Disease: Task 10 - Normal mode analysis

From Bioinformatikpedia
Revision as of 18:38, 4 September 2013 by Gerkej (talk | contribs) (Domains)


table.colBasic2 { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 1px solid black; border-collapse:collapse; }

.colBasic2 th,td { padding: 3px; border: 1px solid black; }

.colBasic2 td { text-align:left; }

/* for orange try #ff7f00 and #ffaa56 for blue try #005fbf and #aad4ff

maria's style blue: #adceff grey: #efefef

  • /

.colBasic2 tr th { background-color:#efefef; color: black;} .colBasic2 tr:first-child th { background-color:#adceff; color:black;}


lab journal

With normal mode analysis (NMA), you are able to simulate or analyse the natural resonant globular movements of proteins. There are two different webserver available to do a NMA, WEBnm@ and ElNemo. Both bas eon elastic network models (ENM). They provide the following information:


  • deformation energy
  • atomic fluctuations
  • 2D correlation matrix of residue movement
  • atomic displacement


  • normal modes (PDB files) and their animations (in GIF format) of the top five modes
  • 2D matrices of distance fluctuations between all C-alpha atom pairs (CA-vari)
  • RMSD with respect to the second reference structure (if given)
  • visualization of the mean square displacement of all C-alpha atoms associated with a given mode (<R2>)
  • distance variation between successive pairs of CA atoms in the two extreme conformations that were computed for this mode (DQMIN/DQMAX) (still an experimental feature CA-strain)
  • frequency of a mode (normalized relative to the lowest mode frequency)
  • collectivity of a mode (what part of the atoms move together)


WEBnm@ uses only alpha-carbon atoms in the models for the normal mode analysis.


<figtable id="energy">

Mode Deformation Energy Visualisation Movements
7 174.43
Mode 7
8 251.61
Mode 8
9 344.99
Mode 9
10 759.13
Mode 10
equally breathing of the whole structure
11 1099.96
Mode 11
Five best values of the deformation energy for the lowest-frequency non-trivial modes.



<figure id="reso">

Figure 1: Motions of corelated residues of Glucocerebrosidase.

</figure> The Glucocerebrosidase shows a domain definition according to their chains in the vsualization of the corelated residue motion map on the right. Within the chains, which are identical, a very big domain and small domain. In <xr id="reso"/> the big domains are centered in each chain. The smaller one conssists of two parts in the sequence, which are before and after the residues of the big domain. In 3D space those two parts are formed together to a bunch of sheets. In contrary, the the big domain consists of a high number of helices and a few sheets. All domain databases agree with each other that the bigger domain has a glycosidic characteristics. However, they differ in their information about the second domain. While PFAM neglects a second domain, CATH classifies it as an alpha-mannosidase II and SCOP identifies a beta-glycanases. A correlation of motions between residues at the beginning and the end of a chain can be observed. Between the chains there is only a slight movement correlation observable. Some residues of the big domain in one chain correlate with a few other residues at the beginning and outside the domain of the other chain.

As chain A and B are identical, the following domain definition concentrates on one domain: PFAM

  • 1 domain
  • PF02055: Glycoside hydrolase family 30



  • 2 domains
  • b.71.1.2: Composite domain of glycosyl hydrolase families 5, 30, 39 and 51
  • c.1.8.3: beta-glycanases


ElNemo uses also only the C-alpha atoms of the structure for normal mode analysis, therefore it takes only the ATOM record from the PDB file, ignoring the HETATM record of a ligand. We ran ElNemo with our reference structure 1OGS without changing anything, so that the ligand could be ignored for the normal mode calculation.

For the normal mode analysis we specified a cutoff of 10 Å between the C-alpha atoms. A hundred modes were calculated (<R2>, frequency and collectivity information of all found modes). For the best five modes, i.e. with lowest frequency and the highest collectivity of the motions, more information is provided, including PDB files and animations in GIF format. B-factor analysis of ElNemo server yielded correlation of 0.662 for 1006 C-alpha atoms (main result page). The best five modes are presented in <xr id="elnemo_modes"/>. Those modes have the lowest frequency. The first six modes are omitted by default, because they have low complexity.

<figtable id="elnemo_modes">

Mode Frequency Collectivity Animations Description
a b c
7 1.00 0.7546 Mode7 1.gif Mode7 2.gif Mode7 3.gif Hinge motion of the two identical chains.
8 1.22 0.7472 Mode8 1.gif Mode8 2.gif Mode8 3.gif Twist motion of the both chains in opposite directions to the axis which connects the chains combined with a slight bending movement between the two domains (described in the WEBnm@ section) in each chain.
9 1.74 0.7765 Mode9 1.gif Mode9 2.gif Mode9 3.gif Twist motion of the both chains in opposite directions to the axis which connects the chains, similar to that in mode 8 (but no bending between the domains).
10 3.36 0.7970 Mode10 1.gif Mode10 2.gif Mode10 3.gif Breathing of the chains and a slight bending movement between the two domains in each chain.
11 4.30 0.8301 Mode11 1.gif Mode11 2.gif Mode11 3.gif Movement of the chains towards each other and back in the perpendicular direction to the axis connecting them, combined with a slight twist, similar to that in modes 8 and 9. A slight breathing and a hinge movement between the two domains in each chain, similar to that in mode 10, is detectable.
Five lowest-frequency modes for the structure 1OGS created by ElNemo (cutoff used to identify elastic interactions=10).


As we can see from the animations of the best five modes, the most flexible regions are where the two chains connect to each other (make a twist, a hinge and a movement towards each other and back on perpendicular from the chain connecting axis) and inside the chains the regions between the two domains (SCOP and CATH) are most flexible (produce a sort of a hinge movement). Other regions inside the domains seem to be stable.


As mentioned, both servers calculate the normal modes from the C-alpha atoms of a structure only. In principle, 3N-6 normal modes could be calculated, where N is the number of atoms in the protein molecule. This number the be explained very simply. Each atom has three coordinates in the space and thus 3N degrees of freedom. However, to account for rotation symmetry and translation, two times 3 degrees of freedom must be subtracted. As the GBA protein has 536 residues and thus 536 C-alpha atoms, 1602 normal modes can be computed. However, it is very calculation intensive to find all of them. In normal mode analysis we are interested only in slow, "big range" movements on the chain and domain levels, therefore only few low frequency normal modes are of interest.

As we do not have a structure completely without a ligand, but only structures with different, not native ligands. The reason for is that the complex with the native ligand, glucosylceramide, is too unstable and the enzyme processes the glucosylceramide instantly into the substrates, ceramide and glucose. Therefore, unfortunately we do not have structures with different conformations for glucocerebrosidase. For this reason, we could not do the option of calculation of normal modes with two different structures. Simply deleting of a ligand from the PDB structure would not result in a change of the main chain coordinates and thus have no effect on the normal modes.

TODO: Can you observe notable differences between the normal modes calculated by the different servers?
ElNemo does not compute a deformation energy, like WEBnm@.

Unlike molecular dynamics (MD), NMA can only compute slow, globular and harmonic motions of a protein. Nevertheless, NMA can help to understand protein motions on the domain and inter-chain level with a comparatively low computational cost. This is a great advantage over the much more time consuming MD. However, NMA only takes the C-alpha atoms into account, thus only main chain movements can influence normal modes, whereas MD accounts for the movements of all atoms in a molecule. Thus, MD can simulate the movements of side chains and thus account for an influence of each SNP, whereas NMA can only notice the effect of an SNP, if it changes the location of the C-alpha atom.


WEBnm@ server

  1. ElNemo server
  2. K. Suhre & Y.H. Sanejouand, ElNemo: a normal mode web-server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, W610-W614, 2004.
  3. K. Suhre & Y.H. Sanejouand, On the potential of normal mode analysis for solving difficult molecular replacement problems. Acta Cryst. D vol.60, p796-799, 2004 © International Union of Crystallography.