Task alignments 2011
Most prediction methods are based on comparisons to related proteins. Therefore, the search for related sequences and the alignment to other proteins is a prerequisite for most of the analyses in this practical. Hence we will investigate the recall and alignment quality of different alignment methods.
Theoretical background talks
The introductory talks shall give an overview of
- pairwise alignments and high-throuput profile searches (e.g. Fasta, Blast, PSI-Blast, HHsearch)
- multiple alignments (e.g. ClustalW, Probcons, Mafft, Muscle, T-Coffee, Cobalt) and MSA editors (e.g. Jalview)
with special attention to advantages and limitations of theses methods.
Sequence searches
Subsequently, for every native protein sequence for every disease the students shall employ different tools for database searching and multiple sequence alignment. The methods to employ (minimally) are:
- Searches of the non-redundant sequence database:
- Fasta
- Blast
- PSI-Blast using standard parameters with all combinations of
- 3 iterations
- 5 iterations
- default E-value cutoff (0.005)
- E-value cutoff 10E-6;
- HHsearch
For evaluating the differences of the search methods:
- compare the result lists (how much overlap, distribution of %identity and score)
- check HSSP for "true positives" and see how many of these are found (-> recall)
Multiple sequence alignments
Multiple sequence alignments of 20 sequences from the database search, including sequences from these ranges:
- 99 - 90% sequence identity
- 89 - 60% sequence identity
- 59 - 40% sequence identity
- 39 - 20% sequence identity
Ideally there should be 5 sequences from each range with at least one pdb-structure in each range.
The alignment methods to use are:
- Cobalt
- ClustalW
- Muscle
- T-Coffee with
- default parameters ("t_coffee your_sequences.fasta)
- use of 3D-Coffee
Comparison of the alignments:
- How many conserved columns?
- Are functionally important residues conserved?
- How many gaps?
- Are there gaps in secondary structure elements?
