Talk:Glucocerebrosidase homology modelling
From Bioinformatikpedia
Very nice report!
Some comments:
- an RMSD of 1.9 A between the apo and a complex reference structure seems higher than expected for me. Do you know where the big differences are?
- It's interesting that Modeller messed up the secondary structures for the mixed templates. Are the templates so different? Didn't it manage to align them in 3D?
- Did you notice that the TM-score of the combined model is also better than the the on of the 2E4T model alone?
- Modeller also gives a numeric score for its models (DOPE). Did you check that? Does that score correlate with the model quality?