Normal Mode Analysis of ARSA

Introduction

Normal Mode Analysis (NMA) is a very useful tool to analyse large-scale motions in proteins. There are two approaches. In the first approach, all-atoms were used to calculate the harmonic motions. As this procedure needs a lot of memory, the elastic network model was developed, which does not take all interactions into account. Like this the memory needed can be dramatically reduced and the method can be applied to larger proteins.
In this TASK, we apply different NMA methods to our protein ARSA to investigate the flexibility and motions of the structure.

For most methods, we were able generate animated pictures to visualise the results. We used gifsicle to generate the animated gifs:

gifsicle --delay=5 --loop --colors 256 *.gif > anim.gif

When we used pdb files to visualize the movements, we first generated pngs of the single frames and converted them to the gif format before applying gifsicle:

for file in *.png; do convert "$file" "$(basename $file .png).gif";done

WEBnm@

WEBnm@ was developed by Hollup et al. in 2005 <ref> Hollup SM, Sælensminde G, Reuter N. (2005) WEBnm@: a web application for normal mode analysis of proteins BMC Bioinformatics </ref>. On the server, there are two types of analyses possible:

Single Analysis calculates the lowest frequency normal modes of the protein.
Comparative Analysis calculates and compares the normal modes of a set of aligned protein structures.

We chose the single analysis for our protein with default settings. after a short calculation time, the interface directly guides the user to a Jmol applet were the mode is dynamically visualized. We used this appled to generated images for each frame and then used gifsicle as described above to generate the animated gifs, shown below.
Furthermore we saved plots of the initial protein structure together with vectors of the movements, as well as a figure which visualizes the extent of the molecular displacement along the protein.

Mode	Motion	Vectors	Displacement
mode 7
mode 8
mode 9
mode 10
mode 11
mode 12

Mode 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 show a huge displacement at the end of the protein. If we have a look at the animated gifs, we can see that a helix is involved in this movement.
Int mode 11, the movement is distributed more along the whole protein. Also here, the helix is involved in the movement, but not as strong as in the other modes.

The helix extends from position 450 to 469. The question is, if this movement is functional or not, i.e. if it is for example involved during substrate binding.

ElNemo

THe ElNemo webserver was published in 2004 by Suhre and Sanejouand <ref> K. Suhre & Y.H. Sanejouand (2004) ElNemo: a normal mode web-server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement. Nucleic Acids Research</ref>. The webserver takes a single pdb file of the structure of interest and computes the first five non-trivial normal modes for the protein. We submitted our pdb file with the default parameters. ElNemo outputs pdb files of the different frames, plots visualizing the fluctuations and already animated gifs of the modes.
We present the animations by ElNemo together with the plots of the fluctuations in the following table. For convenience and a more thorough visualisation, we generated additional animations with pymol from the pdb file, generated by ElNemo.

Mode	Pymol animation	picture 1 from ElNemo	picture 2 from ElNemo	picture 3 from ElNemo	Fluctuations
Mode 7
Mode 8
Mode 9
Mode 10
Mode 11

Like in the analysis with WEBnm@, all modes computed by Elnemo show a large movement of the terminal helix of the protein. In these results, the movements look even larger than in the previous analysis. It even looks like a "closure-movement". Interestingly, the substrate binding sites are located at the bottom of the protein (below the yellow colored beta-sheets). Unfortunately, PDB does not contain any resolved structures where the substrate is bound to the protein. So we can not verify this hypothesis.

Anisotropic Network Model web server

	mode 1	mode 2	mode 3	mode 4	mode 5
Motion
Distance
Fluctuations

oGNM – Gaussian network model

oGNM was developed by Yang et al. in 2006 <ref>oGNM: A protein dynamics online calculation engine using the Gaussian Network Model" Yang, L.-W., Rader, A.J., Liu, X., Jursa, C.J., Chen S.C., Karimi, H, Bahar, I. Nucleic Acids Res, 34, W24-31, 2006 </ref>. It slightly differs from the other methods used during this TASK. It uses a Gaussian network model to compute the fluctuations in the protein. Unlike the other methods it does not output the movements itself, but measures, that reflect the motion and flexibility of the protein.

The output contains, e.g. mobility profiles of residues corresponding to the 20 slowest modes of motion predicted by the GNM, the predicted and experimental B-factors and the cross-correlation between residue fluctuations, plotted as a correlation map. In the table below, we organized the first five non-zero modes generated by oGNM. The table contains the color-coded mobility profile and the fluctuations.

The link in the TASK description did not work so we used the following address for our calculations:

http://ignm.ccbb.pitt.edu/Online_GNM.htm

	mode 7	mode 8	mode 9	mode 10	mode 11
Motion
Fluctuations

As the fluctuations of the different modes are at a very different scale, i.e. the amplitude of the movements is very different, we visualized all fluctuations of the first five modes together (plot is shown below). Furthermore, we computed the cross-correlation of our first five modes and of all 20 modes generated by oGNM (see below).

Fluctuations of mode 7-11

Correlation of mode 1-20

Correlation of mode 7-11

The results nicely agree with the previous analyses. Again the terminal helix seems to be involved in the major movements within the protein (mode 7,8,11). Mode 9 and 10 show some mobibility also in the middle of the protein, but these movements are not as large as the movements of the terminal helix. This can be seen in the plot where all fluctuations are visualised together. One can clearly see, that mode 7, 8 and 11 are show much larger movements than mode 9 and 10. The movements of mode 9 and 10, however, should be similar to mode bla of WEBnma@ where we have also a mobility covering the whole protein and like here this mobility is much lower than the mobility of the helix. Unfortunately we cannot visualize the movements itself from the output of oGNM, but at least, the mobility profiles to mode bla of WEBnm@ look very similar.