Task 5: Homology Modeling
1A6Z chain A was used as modeling target for all three methods.
Modeller
We used Modeller to create models based on a single template and multiple templates.
Single template
<css> table.colBasic2 { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 2px solid black; border-collapse:collapse; width: 70%; } .colBasic2 th,td { padding: 3px; border: 2px solid black; } .colBasic2 td { text-align:left; } .colBasic2 tr th { background-color:#efefef; color: black;} .colBasic2 tr:first-child th { background-color:#adceff; color:black;} </css>
<figtable id="Modeller single">
Template | Seq. identity | std Alignment | 2d alignment | curated Alignment | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMSD | TM score | RMSD | TM score | RMSD | TM score | ||
1QVO_A | 39% | 3.647 | 0.6241 | 4.994 | 0.5653 | ||
1S7X_A | 29% | 15.806 | 0.3355 | 18.099 | 0.2509 | ||
1CD1_A | 21% | 18.066 | 0.3640 | 5.640 | 0.4697 |
</figtable>
<xr id="Modeller single"/> lists the selected templates and the Modeller results for the different template structures and alignment methods. In addition to the standard pairwise sequence alignment based on dynamic programming, we also used Modeller's alignment.alig2dn() method to improve the alignment by including secondary structure information and improved the alignments manually. The RMSD and TM score are given for all models. The TM score ranges in the interval of (0, 1]. A value below 0.17 indicates a random similarity and a TM score above 0.5 corresponds to two structures with the same fold in CATH or SCOP (see TM score). Including the secondary structure information did only improve the model of the most distant homolog 1CD1_A.
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
Multiple templates
We also user more than one template in a modeling step. Therefore, we created three sets of structures, one with close homologes, one with distant homologes and one combined set.
<figtable id="multiple sets">
close homology | distant homology | mixed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Template | Seq. identity | Template | Seq. identity | Template | Seq. identity |
1QVO_A | 39% | 3HUJ_C | 23% | 1QVO_A | 39% |
1ZAG_A | 36% | 1CD1_A | 21% | 1CD1_A | 21% |
1RJZ_D | 34% | 1VZY_A | 14% |
</figtable>
<xr id="multiple sets"/> specifies the three sets.
<figtable id="multiple sets">
close homology | distant homology | mixed homology | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Template | 1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A | 1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A, 1RJZ_D | 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A | 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A, 1VZY_A | 1QVO_A, 1CD1_A |
RMSD | 3.432 | 2.431 | 4.130 | 7.741 | 3.974 |
TM score | 0.6553 | 0.7638 | 0.5607 | 0.3814 | 0.5846 |
Pymol visualisation |
</figtable>
Swiss-Model
We used Swiss-Model to create models using 1QVO_A, 1S7X_A and 1CD1_A as template.
<figtable id="swiss-model">
1QVO_A | 1S7X_A | 1CD1_A | |
---|---|---|---|
Template | 1QVO_A | 1S7X_A | 1CD1_A |
Seq. identity | 39% | 29% | 21% |
RMSD | |||
TM score |
</figtable>