Difference between revisions of "Seq.-based mut. analysis HEXA"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→pysicochemical properities) |
(→Visualisation of the mutations) |
||
Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
|SNP-id |
|SNP-id |
||
|mutation codon |
|mutation codon |
||
+ | |picture original aa |
||
− | |aa propensity |
||
+ | |picture mutated aa |
||
− | |consequences |
||
+ | |combined picture |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs121907979 |
|rs121907979 |
||
|Leu -> Arg |
|Leu -> Arg |
||
+ | |[[Image:L39.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Leucine]] |
||
− | |aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> positive charged, polar, hydrophilic |
||
+ | |[[Image:39R.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Arginine]] |
||
− | |Leucine is smaller and without a positive charge. Therefore, Arg is too big for the position of Leu, therefore, the change of Leu with Arg has to cause changes in the 3D structure of the protein. Furthermore, Leu is a hydrophobic amino acid, whereas Arg is hydrophilic. This is the complete contrary and therefore we suggest, that the protein will not function any longer. |
||
+ | |[[Image:L39R.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs11551324 |
|rs11551324 |
||
|Thr -> Thr |
|Thr -> Thr |
||
+ | | |
||
− | |polar, small, hydrophilic, neutral -> polar, small, hydrophilic, neutral |
||
− | | |
+ | |[[Image:T109T.png|thumb|150px|Visualisation of the silent mutation]] |
+ | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs61731240 |
|rs61731240 |
||
|His -> Asp |
|His -> Asp |
||
+ | |[[Image:H179.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Histidine]] |
||
− | |aromatic, positive charged, polar, hydrophilic -> negative charged, small, polar, hydrophilic |
||
+ | |[[Image:179D.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Aspartate]] |
||
− | |On the one side, both amino acids are polar, but on the other side, His is positively charged, while Asp is negatively charged, which is an essential difference between these both amino acids. Therefore it is very likely, that this change causes big changes in the structure of the protein and the protein therefore will probably not work any longer. Furthermore, the structure of the two amino acids is very different, because of the aromatic ring of the His. |
||
+ | |[[Image:H179D.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs121907974 |
|rs121907974 |
||
|Phe -> Ser |
|Phe -> Ser |
||
+ | |[[Image:F211.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Phenylalanine]] |
||
− | |aromatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> polar, tiny, hydrophilic, neutral |
||
+ | |[[Image:211S.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Serine]] |
||
− | |Phe is much bigger than Ser and also contains an aromatic ring. Furthermore, Phe is hydrophobic, whereas Ser is hydrophilic. Because of this, the structure of the protein will change surely and we suggest, that the protein will not work any longer. |
||
+ | |[[Image:F211S.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs1054374 |
|rs1054374 |
||
|Ser -> Ile |
|Ser -> Ile |
||
+ | |[[Image:S293.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Serine]] |
||
− | |polar, tiny, hydrophilic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral |
||
+ | |[[Image:293I.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Iseleucine]] |
||
− | |Ile is much bigger than Ser and also is branched, because it is an aliphatic amino acid. Therefore the structure of both amino acids is really different and Ile is to big for the position where Ser was. Therefore, there has to be a big change in the 3D structure of the protein and the protein probably will loose its function. |
||
+ | |[[Image:S293I.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs28942072 |
|rs28942072 |
||
|Val -> Val |
|Val -> Val |
||
+ | | |
||
− | |aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral |
||
− | | |
+ | |[[Image:V324V.png|thumb|150px|Visualization of the silent mutation]] |
+ | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs121907967 |
|rs121907967 |
||
|Trp -> TER |
|Trp -> TER |
||
+ | |[[Image:W329.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Tryptophan]] |
||
− | |aromatic, polar, hydrophobic -> TER |
||
+ | | |
||
− | |By this change, the protein is not complete, therefore it is not possible for the protein to fold and to function. |
||
+ | |[[Image:L39R.png|thumb|150px|Visualization of the mutated protein]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs121907982 |
|rs121907982 |
||
|Ile -> Val |
|Ile -> Val |
||
+ | |[[Image:I436.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Iseleucine]] |
||
− | |aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral |
||
+ | |[[Image:436V.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Valin]] |
||
− | |In this case, the pysicochemical properties are equal. Furthermore, they almost agree in their size. Therefore, we suggest, that there is no big effect on the 3D structure of the protein and therefore, also no big effect on the protein function. |
||
+ | |[[Image:I436V.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs121907968 |
|rs121907968 |
||
|Trp -> Arg |
|Trp -> Arg |
||
+ | |[[Image:W485.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Tryptophan]] |
||
− | |aromatic, polar, hydrophobic, neutral -> positive charged, polar, hydrophilic |
||
+ | |[[Image:485R.png|thumb|150px|Amino acid Arginine]] |
||
− | |Trp is very big, because of two aromatic rings in its structure. Furthermore, it is hydrophobic, whereas, Arg is a hydrophilic amino acid. Therefore, the changes in the 3D structure might be extreme and delete the function of the protein. |
||
+ | |[[Image:W485R.png|thumb|150px|Picture which visualize the mutation]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|rs4777502 |
|rs4777502 |
||
|Glu -> Glu |
|Glu -> Glu |
||
+ | | |
||
− | |negative charged, polar, hydrophilic -> negative charged, polar, hydrophilic |
||
− | | |
+ | |[[Image:E506E.png|thumb|150px|Visualization of the silent mutation]] |
+ | | |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 15:28, 21 June 2011
Mutations
SNP-id | codon number | mutation codon | mutation triplet |
rs121907979 | 39 | Leu -> Arg | CTT -> CGT |
rs11551324 | 109 | Thr -> Thr | ACC -> ACT |
rs61731240 | 179 | His -> Asp | CAT -> GAT |
rs121907974 | 211 | Phe -> Ser | TTC -> TCC |
rs1054374 | 293 | Ser -> Ile | AGT -> ATT |
rs28942072 | 324 | Val -> Val | GTT -> GTA |
rs121907967 | 329 | Trp -> TER | TGG -> TAG |
rs121907982 | 436 | Ile -> Val | ATA -> GTA |
rs121907968 | 485 | Trp -> Arg | gTGG -> CGG |
rs4777502 | 506 | Glu -> Glu | GAG -> GAA |
pysicochemical properities
SNP-id | mutation codon | aa propensity | consequences |
rs121907979 | Leu -> Arg | aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> positive charged, polar, hydrophilic | Leucine is smaller and without a positive charge. Therefore, Arg is too big for the position of Leu, therefore, the change of Leu with Arg has to cause changes in the 3D structure of the protein. Furthermore, Leu is a hydrophobic amino acid, whereas Arg is hydrophilic. This is the complete contrary and therefore we suggest, that the protein will not function any longer. |
rs11551324 | Thr -> Thr | polar, small, hydrophilic, neutral -> polar, small, hydrophilic, neutral | no consequences -> silent mutation |
rs61731240 | His -> Asp | aromatic, positive charged, polar, hydrophilic -> negative charged, small, polar, hydrophilic | On the one side, both amino acids are polar, but on the other side, His is positively charged, while Asp is negatively charged, which is an essential difference between these both amino acids. Therefore it is very likely, that this change causes big changes in the structure of the protein and the protein therefore will probably not work any longer. Furthermore, the structure of the two amino acids is very different, because of the aromatic ring of the His. |
rs121907974 | Phe -> Ser | aromatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> polar, tiny, hydrophilic, neutral | Phe is much bigger than Ser and also contains an aromatic ring. Furthermore, Phe is hydrophobic, whereas Ser is hydrophilic. Because of this, the structure of the protein will change surely and we suggest, that the protein will not work any longer. |
rs1054374 | Ser -> Ile | polar, tiny, hydrophilic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral | Ile is much bigger than Ser and also is branched, because it is an aliphatic amino acid. Therefore the structure of both amino acids is really different and Ile is to big for the position where Ser was. Therefore, there has to be a big change in the 3D structure of the protein and the protein probably will loose its function. |
rs28942072 | Val -> Val | aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral | no consequences -> silent mutation |
rs121907967 | Trp -> TER | aromatic, polar, hydrophobic -> TER | By this change, the protein is not complete, therefore it is not possible for the protein to fold and to function. |
rs121907982 | Ile -> Val | aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral -> aliphatic, hydrophobic, neutral | In this case, the pysicochemical properties are equal. Furthermore, they almost agree in their size. Therefore, we suggest, that there is no big effect on the 3D structure of the protein and therefore, also no big effect on the protein function. |
rs121907968 | Trp -> Arg | aromatic, polar, hydrophobic, neutral -> positive charged, polar, hydrophilic | Trp is very big, because of two aromatic rings in its structure. Furthermore, it is hydrophobic, whereas, Arg is a hydrophilic amino acid. Therefore, the changes in the 3D structure might be extreme and delete the function of the protein. |
rs4777502 | Glu -> Glu | negative charged, polar, hydrophilic -> negative charged, polar, hydrophilic | no consequences -> silent mutation |
Visualisation of the mutations
SNP-id | mutation codon | picture original aa | picture mutated aa | combined picture |
rs121907979 | Leu -> Arg | |||
rs11551324 | Thr -> Thr | |||
rs61731240 | His -> Asp | |||
rs121907974 | Phe -> Ser | |||
rs1054374 | Ser -> Ile | |||
rs28942072 | Val -> Val | |||
rs121907967 | Trp -> TER | |||
rs121907982 | Ile -> Val | |||
rs121907968 | Trp -> Arg | |||
rs4777502 | Glu -> Glu |