Difference between revisions of "Lab journal task 5"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(I-Tasser)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
== I-Tasser ==
 
== I-Tasser ==
   
I-Tasser was also used from the web interface. Option I was used to specify a specific template and Option II was used for the low sequence similarity group to exclude sequences with
+
I-Tasser was also used from the web interface. Option I was used to specify a specific template and Option II was used for the low sequence similarity group to exclude sequences with over 30% identity.

Revision as of 02:08, 27 August 2013

We used the structure of 1A6Z chain A as target. The templates were selected based on the structures assembled for task 4 and also the Blast alignment from task 2. Unfortunatels, we could not find a sequence with a higher sequence identity than 39%.

-selection of template structures

Modeller

-creation of alignments: sdt and 2d

The RMSD and GDT score were calculated with TM scoring function of the [the http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/TM-score/ Zang lab]. The function was downloaded and executed with:

TMscore model.pdb 1a6z_a.pdb

We then extracted the RMSD and GDT_TS score from the output. The GDT score is given as value between 0 and 1.

We searched the Blast hits from task 2 to create sets with close and distant homology. We could not find a structure with a higher sequence identity than 39%.

- computation of MSA: how?

Swiss-Model

Swiss-Model was executed online and the 'Automatic Modelling Mode' was used. In the advanced options, we specified the different templates.

I-Tasser

I-Tasser was also used from the web interface. Option I was used to specify a specific template and Option II was used for the low sequence similarity group to exclude sequences with over 30% identity.