Difference between revisions of "Task 5: Homology Modeling"

From Bioinformatikpedia
Line 33: Line 33:
 
! || || TM score || RMSD || TM score || RMSD || TM score || RMSD
 
! || || TM score || RMSD || TM score || RMSD || TM score || RMSD
 
|-
 
|-
| 1QVO_A || 39% || || || || || ||
+
| 1QVO_A || 39% || 0.6241 ||3.647 ||0.5653 ||4.994 || ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1S7X_A || 29% || || || || || ||
+
| 1S7X_A || 29% || 0.3355|| 15.806|| 0.2509 || 18.099|| ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1cd1_A || 21% || || || || || ||
+
| 1cd1_A || 21% || 0.3640 ||18.066 || 0.4697 || 5.640 || ||
 
|+ style="caption-side: bottom; text-align: left" |<font size=1.5>'''Table 1:'''Template structures and their sequence identity to the target, as computed by Blast. The RMSD and TM score are given as a quality measure for the different models based on a pairwise sequence alignment with dynamic programming (std Alignment), pairwise sequence alignment with additional secondary structure information (2d Alignment) and manually curated alignments (curated Alignment).
 
|+ style="caption-side: bottom; text-align: left" |<font size=1.5>'''Table 1:'''Template structures and their sequence identity to the target, as computed by Blast. The RMSD and TM score are given as a quality measure for the different models based on a pairwise sequence alignment with dynamic programming (std Alignment), pairwise sequence alignment with additional secondary structure information (2d Alignment) and manually curated alignments (curated Alignment).
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 22:48, 25 August 2013

lab journal task 5

1A6Z chain A was used as modeling target in all three methods.

Modeller

We used Modeller to create models based on a single template and multiple templates.

Single template

<css> table.colBasic2 { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 2px solid black; border-collapse:collapse; width: 70%; } .colBasic2 th,td { padding: 3px; border: 2px solid black; } .colBasic2 td { text-align:left; } .colBasic2 tr th { background-color:#efefef; color: black;} .colBasic2 tr:first-child th { background-color:#adceff; color:black;} </css>

<figtable id="Modeller single">

Template Seq. identity std Alignment 2d alignment curated Alignment
TM score RMSD TM score RMSD TM score RMSD
1QVO_A 39% 0.6241 3.647 0.5653 4.994
1S7X_A 29% 0.3355 15.806 0.2509 18.099
1cd1_A 21% 0.3640 18.066 0.4697 5.640
Table 1:Template structures and their sequence identity to the target, as computed by Blast. The RMSD and TM score are given as a quality measure for the different models based on a pairwise sequence alignment with dynamic programming (std Alignment), pairwise sequence alignment with additional secondary structure information (2d Alignment) and manually curated alignments (curated Alignment).

</figtable>

<xr id="Modeller single"/> lists the selected templates and the Modeller results for the different template structures and alignment methods. In addition to the standard pairwise sequence alignment based on dynamic programming, we also used Modeller's alignment.alig2dn() method to improve the alignment by including secondary structure information and improved the alignments manually.


MSA:

"close" homology
1rjz_D 0.34
1zag_A 0.36
1QVO_A 0.39
distant homology:
3huj_C 0.23
1cd1_A 0.21
1VZY_A 0.14
MIX:
1cd1_A 0.21
1QVO_A 0.39

Swiss-Modell

I-TASSER