Difference between revisions of "MD simulation analysis TSD"
(→Pressure) |
(→Pressure) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
</figtable> |
</figtable> |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
+ | <xr id="tab:pressure"/> shows the pressure oscillations for the three simulations. As can be seen per-frame values differ by several 100 bar, as to be expected <ref name="gromacsmanualpressure">http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Pressure</ref> |
||
− | Deve |
||
<br style="clear:both;"/> |
<br style="clear:both;"/> |
Revision as of 17:30, 30 August 2012
Contents
General
<figtable id="tbl:generalstats">
Model | CPU | Runtime | ns/day | days/s |
---|---|---|---|---|
style="border-style: solid; border-width: 0 0 0 0" | Wildtype | 16 | 13h52 | 17.3 | 3896 |
R178H | 12 | 19h03 | 12.6 | 5354 |
P182L | 32 | 07h08 | 33.6 | 2006 |
</figtable>
<xr id="tbl:generalstats"/> shows general statistics about the three simulations. It should be noted that the output of gmxcheck does not account for the number of CPUs used in the calculation and only reports the real time that passed. Normalizing the runtimes by the number of CPUs involved yields that the Wildtype and P182L mutation completed within 4 hours. R178H took 4 hours longer, however the difference is negligible, considering that they were not done in a testing environment and it is assumed that all CPUs could maintain equal load throughout the runs. In fact Gromacs reports a particularly high 12% of the time being lost due to PP/PME imbalance.
Thermodynamics
Pressure
<figtable id="tab:pressure">
</figtable>
<xr id="tab:pressure"/> shows the pressure oscillations for the three simulations. As can be seen per-frame values differ by several 100 bar, as to be expected <ref name="gromacsmanualpressure">http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Pressure</ref>
Temperature
LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM v LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM v LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM v LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
Potential
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
v
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
v
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM
v
LORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
Total Energy
LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM v LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM
LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUM v LORETEM IPSUM LORETEM IPSUMLORETEM IPSUM