Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fabry:Structure-based mutation analysis"
From Bioinformatikpedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hellohello! |
Hellohello! |
||
Finally some statements that you probably dont get to see before we meet :/ |
Finally some statements that you probably dont get to see before we meet :/ |
||
| + | |||
| + | Nice and structured entry with not too many pics. :D Or at least they are small and not overwhelming! |
||
In table 3 you have have to get rid of: "Clashes are depicted as red and green disks" That was for table 2 I guess ;) |
In table 3 you have have to get rid of: "Clashes are depicted as red and green disks" That was for table 2 I guess ;) |
||
| + | |||
| + | In general we find you often are too prompt with your conclusion, that a mutation "has to be disease causing". This always sounds so absolute, but even when it seems that a mutation really changes something in the structure, this mus not necessarily mean it is disease causing. So maybe formulate the conclusio less "hard". |
||
Revision as of 07:19, 26 June 2012
Hellohello! Finally some statements that you probably dont get to see before we meet :/
Nice and structured entry with not too many pics. :D Or at least they are small and not overwhelming!
In table 3 you have have to get rid of: "Clashes are depicted as red and green disks" That was for table 2 I guess ;)
In general we find you often are too prompt with your conclusion, that a mutation "has to be disease causing". This always sounds so absolute, but even when it seems that a mutation really changes something in the structure, this mus not necessarily mean it is disease causing. So maybe formulate the conclusio less "hard".
