Difference between revisions of "CD task7 protocol"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→FoldX) |
|||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
<JOBEND>#; |
<JOBEND>#; |
||
<ENDFILE>#; |
<ENDFILE>#; |
||
+ | |||
+ | command |
||
+ | /opt/SS12-Practical/foldx/FoldX.linux64 -run run.txt |
Revision as of 15:12, 20 June 2012
Choosing structure
So, we decided to use 2O4H, since it has a bound substrate, low resolution and a listed pH value.
Apo-structure: 2O53 Resolution: 2,7, R-free: 0,269, pH: 6.0, chains: A,B Holo-structure: 2O4H Resolution: 2,7, R-free: 0,271, pH: 6.0, chains: A,B intermediate substrate analog: N-phosphonomethyl-L-aspartate Apo-structure: 2I3C Resolution: 2,8, R-free: 0,243, pH: - , chains: A,B Ensemble Refinement 2Q51 Resolution: 2,8, R-free: 0,239, pH: - , chains: A,B
For 2O4H, there are only missing residues at the N- and C-terminal ends, which can be neglected:
REMARK 465 MISSING RESIDUES REMARK 465 THE FOLLOWING RESIDUES WERE NOT LOCATED IN THE REMARK 465 EXPERIMENT. (M=MODEL NUMBER; RES=RESIDUE NAME; C=CHAIN REMARK 465 IDENTIFIER; SSSEQ=SEQUENCE NUMBER; I=INSERTION CODE.) REMARK 465 M RES C SSSEQI REMARK 465 1 ALA A -1 REMARK 465 1 ILE A 0 REMARK 465 1 ALA A 1 REMARK 465 1 THR A 2 REMARK 465 1 SER A 3 REMARK 465 1 CYS A 4 REMARK 465 1 HIS A 5 REMARK 465 1 ILE A 6 REMARK 465 1 ALA A 7 REMARK 465 1 GLU A 8 REMARK 465 1 CYS A 311 REMARK 465 1 LEU A 312 REMARK 465 1 HIS A 313
FoldX
2O4H.txt
2O4H_chainA.pdb
mutant_list.txt
E285A,A305E,G123E,R71H,R71K,K213E,V278M,M82T,E235K,I270T;
run.txt
<TITLE>FOLDX_runscript; <JOBSTART>#; <PDBS>#; <BATCH>2O4H.txt; <COMMANDS>FOLDX_commandfile; <BuildModel>#,mutant_list.txt; <END>#; <OPTIONS>FOLDX_optionfile; <Temperature>298; <R>#; <pH>7; <IonStrength>0.050; <water>-CRYSTAL; <metal>-CRYSTAL; <VdWDesign>2; <OutPDB>true; <pdb_hydrogens>false; <complex_with_DNA> true; <END>#; <JOBEND>#; <ENDFILE>#;
command
/opt/SS12-Practical/foldx/FoldX.linux64 -run run.txt