Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canavan Task 2 - Sequence alignments"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→Review) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all |
* Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all |
||
* Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and I think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits. |
* Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and I think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits. |
||
+ | ** Agreed, this might also solve you problem of no pdb structures -jonas |
||
* You could have tried to use the whole big database for PSI-Blast and PDB for HHBlits to make the results more comparable. |
* You could have tried to use the whole big database for PSI-Blast and PDB for HHBlits to make the results more comparable. |
||
*You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's. |
*You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's. |
Revision as of 08:55, 8 May 2012
- Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. andrea 10:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Review
- Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all
- Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and I think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits.
- Agreed, this might also solve you problem of no pdb structures -jonas
- You could have tried to use the whole big database for PSI-Blast and PDB for HHBlits to make the results more comparable.
- You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's.
- I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??.
- Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but I would have enjoyed reading more about it :)
I did not have the time to really rethink your approach in detail, but you worked nicely and especially very efficiently.
Best, Alice