Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canavan Task 2 - Sequence alignments"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→Review) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all |
* Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all |
||
− | * Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and |
+ | * Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and I think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits. |
*You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's. |
*You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's. |
||
* I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??. |
* I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??. |
||
− | * Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but |
+ | * Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but I would have enjoyed reading more about it :) |
− | I |
+ | I did not have the time to really rethink your approach in detail, but you worked nicely and especially very efficiently. |
Best, Alice |
Best, Alice |
Revision as of 00:40, 8 May 2012
- Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. andrea 10:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Review
- Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all
- Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and I think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits.
- You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's.
- I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??.
- Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but I would have enjoyed reading more about it :)
I did not have the time to really rethink your approach in detail, but you worked nicely and especially very efficiently. Best, Alice