Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence Search and Multiple Sequence Alignment (PKU)"
Rackersederj (talk | contribs) (→suggestions) |
Rackersederj (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* In Figure 1 I would suggest another set of colors, since red, blue and purple are a little hard to distinguish here. --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 19:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
* In Figure 1 I would suggest another set of colors, since red, blue and purple are a little hard to distinguish here. --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 19:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
− | * It is a little confusing if you refer to a table if you actually mean a set of figures. You might want to try using |
+ | * It is a little confusing if you refer to a table if you actually mean a set of figures. You might want to try using "gallery" --[[User:Rackersederj|Rackersederj]] 19:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:57, 7 May 2012
This is just a place to add criticism and or positive feedback so we Jonathan and Sebastian have a possibility to improve. Pleas note, that we wont be able to adress all matters immediately but we will address them eventually!
criticism
- Despite some offline discussion I still do not get this sentence:
In order to display the runtime PSIBlast uses in order to get results you asked for we used a little skript which uses PSIblast with a variety of parametersettings. (Section 3.2 PSIBlast) --Rackersederj 19:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
positive feedback
suggestions
Just a formal suggestion: The section 'Database Searches' is quite hard to read since there are several newlines missing, especially in the e-Vales subsection. You could put these parts in 'preformatted text' boxes for example. Also, your figure 1 does not exist (yet?). Staniewski 10:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
The section is still work in progress, but your points have mostly been fixed, thanks! Boidolj 13:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- In Figure 1 I would suggest another set of colors, since red, blue and purple are a little hard to distinguish here. --Rackersederj 19:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is a little confusing if you refer to a table if you actually mean a set of figures. You might want to try using "gallery" --Rackersederj 19:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)