Difference between revisions of "Task alignments 2012"
m (→Sequence searches) |
m (→Multiple sequence alignments) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* 59 - 40% sequence identity |
* 59 - 40% sequence identity |
||
* 39 - 20% sequence identity |
* 39 - 20% sequence identity |
||
− | Ideally there should be 5 sequences from each range with at least one pdb-structure in each range. |
+ | Ideally there should be 5 sequences from each range with at least one pdb-structure in each range. -- This will only be possible in rare cases! |
The alignment methods to use are: |
The alignment methods to use are: |
||
− | * Cobalt |
||
* ClustalW |
* ClustalW |
||
* Muscle |
* Muscle |
Revision as of 12:55, 10 April 2012
Most prediction methods are based on comparisons to related proteins. Therefore, the search for related sequences and the alignment to other proteins is a prerequisite for most of the analyses in this practical. Hence we will investigate the recall and alignment quality of different alignment methods.
Theoretical background talks
The introductory talks should given an overview of
- pairwise alignments and high-throuput profile searches (e.g. Fasta, Blast, PSI-Blast, HHsearch)
- multiple alignments (e.g. ClustalW, Probcons, Mafft, Muscle, T-Coffee, Cobalt) and MSA editors (e.g. Jalview)
with special attention to advantages and limitations of theses methods.
Sequence searches
Subsequently, for every native protein sequence for every disease the students shall employ different tools for database searching and multiple sequence alignment in the "big80" database. The methods to employ (minimally) are:
- Searches of the non-redundant sequence database big80:
- Blast
- PSI-Blast using standard parameters with all combinations of
- 3 iterations
- 10 iterations
- default E-value cutoff (0.005)
- E-value cutoff 10E-6
- HHblits / HHsearch
Note: Check the outcome of your simple blast search. If there are many significant hits, increase the number of reported hits (-b or max_target_seqs depending on blast version) until no more relevant hits are found. Use that parameter also for the PSI-Blast searches and use a similar setting for HHblits / HHsearch. (Think about why we ask you to do this.)
For evaluating the differences of the search methods:
- compare the result lists (how much overlap, distribution of %identity and score)
- validate the result lists -- e.g.
- using COPS to check whether found pdb entries fall into the same fold class
- using GO to check whether sequences have common GO classifications
Multiple sequence alignments
Multiple sequence alignments of 20 sequences from the database search, including sequences from these ranges:
- 99 - 90% sequence identity
- 89 - 60% sequence identity
- 59 - 40% sequence identity
- 39 - 20% sequence identity
Ideally there should be 5 sequences from each range with at least one pdb-structure in each range. -- This will only be possible in rare cases!
The alignment methods to use are:
- ClustalW
- Muscle
- T-Coffee with
- default parameters ("t_coffee your_sequences.fasta)
- use of 3D-Coffee
Comparison of the alignments:
- How many conserved columns?
- Are functionally important residues conserved?
- How many gaps?
- Are there gaps in secondary structure elements?