Difference between revisions of "Talk:ASPA Sequence Alignments"
From Bioinformatikpedia
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would be nice if you could add a few sentences of discussion of your results. |
It would be nice if you could add a few sentences of discussion of your results. |
||
E.g. |
E.g. |
||
| − | * |
+ | * What conclusion would you draw from the comparison of PSI-Blast runs (e.g. weighing compute time against result)? |
* What is your conclusion concerning recall of HSSP hits? |
* What is your conclusion concerning recall of HSSP hits? |
||
| + | * Which alignment would be most helpful for identifying important residues? Which would be best for modelling (-> gap placement)? |
||
If you go a bit further in analysing your sequence hits, you will notice that your "Hepatitis C" protein is annotated in Uniprot (Q91XE4 ACY3_MOUSE) as Aspartoacylase-2. So this does make sense in your alignment. |
If you go a bit further in analysing your sequence hits, you will notice that your "Hepatitis C" protein is annotated in Uniprot (Q91XE4 ACY3_MOUSE) as Aspartoacylase-2. So this does make sense in your alignment. |
||
Latest revision as of 11:57, 1 July 2011
It would be nice if you could add a few sentences of discussion of your results. E.g.
- What conclusion would you draw from the comparison of PSI-Blast runs (e.g. weighing compute time against result)?
- What is your conclusion concerning recall of HSSP hits?
- Which alignment would be most helpful for identifying important residues? Which would be best for modelling (-> gap placement)?
If you go a bit further in analysing your sequence hits, you will notice that your "Hepatitis C" protein is annotated in Uniprot (Q91XE4 ACY3_MOUSE) as Aspartoacylase-2. So this does make sense in your alignment.
Was Cytochrome the only structure hit you found? -- If I use HHpred online, then it finds quite a number of structures that look promising. You could have taken one in the low identity range.
