Difference between revisions of "Task 5: Homology Modeling"
(→Multiple templates) |
|||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| TM score ||0.6553 ||0.7638 || 0.5607 || 0.3814 || 0.5846 |
| TM score ||0.6553 ||0.7638 || 0.5607 || 0.3814 || 0.5846 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
+ | | pymol visualisation || [[File:close2.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and the model created from 1QVO_A and 1ZAG_A (purple).] || [[File:close.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model created from 1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A and 1RJZ_D (purple).] || [[File:distant2.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model model created from 3HUJ_C and 1CD1_A (purple).] || [[File:distant.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model created from 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A and 1VZY_A (purple).] || [[File:mix.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and the model created from 1QVO_A and 1CD1_A (purple).] |
||
− | | pymol visualisation || align="center" | [[File:close2.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model (purple).] || || || || || |
||
|+ style="caption-side: bottom; text-align: left" |<font size=1.5>'''Table 2:''' Results ofthe modeling with multiple templates. We computed models using 2 structures as templates and also using three structures. |
|+ style="caption-side: bottom; text-align: left" |<font size=1.5>'''Table 2:''' Results ofthe modeling with multiple templates. We computed models using 2 structures as templates and also using three structures. |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 16:12, 26 August 2013
1A6Z chain A was used as modeling target for all three methods.
Modeller
We used Modeller to create models based on a single template and multiple templates.
Single template
<css> table.colBasic2 { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 2px solid black; border-collapse:collapse; width: 70%; } .colBasic2 th,td { padding: 3px; border: 2px solid black; } .colBasic2 td { text-align:left; } .colBasic2 tr th { background-color:#efefef; color: black;} .colBasic2 tr:first-child th { background-color:#adceff; color:black;} </css>
<figtable id="Modeller single">
Template | Seq. identity | std Alignment | 2d alignment | curated Alignment | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMSD | TM score | RMSD | TM score | RMSD | TM score | ||
1QVO_A | 39% | 3.647 | 0.6241 | 4.994 | 0.5653 | ||
1S7X_A | 29% | 15.806 | 0.3355 | 18.099 | 0.2509 | ||
1CD1_A | 21% | 18.066 | 0.3640 | 5.640 | 0.4697 |
</figtable>
<xr id="Modeller single"/> lists the selected templates and the Modeller results for the different template structures and alignment methods. In addition to the standard pairwise sequence alignment based on dynamic programming, we also used Modeller's alignment.alig2dn() method to improve the alignment by including secondary structure information and improved the alignments manually. The RMSD and TM score are given for all models. The TM score ranges in the interval of (0, 1]. A value below 0.17 indicates a random similarity and a TM score above 0.5 corresponds to two structures with the same fold in CATH or SCOP (see TM score). Including the secondary structure information did only improve the model of the most distant homolog 1CD1_A.
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
<figtable id="pymol str. al.">
</figtable>
Multiple templates
We also user more than one template in a modeling step. Therefore, we created three sets of structures, one with close homologes, one with distant homologes and one combined set.
<figtable id="multiple sets">
close homology | distant homology | mixed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Template | Seq. identity | Template | Seq. identity | Template | Seq. identity |
1QVO_A | 39% | 3HUJ_C | 23% | 1QVO_A | 39% |
1ZAG_A | 36% | 1CD1_A | 21% | 1CD1_A | 21% |
1RJZ_D | 34% | 1VZY_A | 14% |
</figtable>
<xr id="multiple sets"/> specifies the three sets.
<figtable id="multiple sets">
close homology | distant homology | mixed homology | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A | 1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A, 1RJZ_D | 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A | 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A, 1VZY_A | 1QVO_A, 1CD1_A | |
RMSD | 3.432 | 2.431 | 4.130 | 7.741 | 3.974 |
TM score | 0.6553 | 0.7638 | 0.5607 | 0.3814 | 0.5846 |
pymol visualisation | [[File:close2.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and the model created from 1QVO_A and 1ZAG_A (purple).] | [[File:close.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model created from 1QVO_A, 1ZAG_A and 1RJZ_D (purple).] | [[File:distant2.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model model created from 3HUJ_C and 1CD1_A (purple).] | [[File:distant.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and model created from 3HUJ_C, 1CD1_A and 1VZY_A (purple).] | [[File:mix.png|thumb|300px| Visualisation of the target (green) and the model created from 1QVO_A and 1CD1_A (purple).] |
</figtable>