Difference between revisions of "Structural Alignments (Phenylketonuria)"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Evaluate sequence alignments)
(Evaluate sequence alignments)
Line 114: Line 114:
 
<center><small>'''<caption>''' ... </caption></small></center>
 
<center><small>'''<caption>''' ... </caption></small></center>
 
</figtable>
 
</figtable>
  +
  +
*last two have a very low probability...
   
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 15:29, 1 June 2013

Summary

...

Explore structural alignments

Lab journal

Dataset generation

Our protein has the CATH Code: 1.10.800.10 (Phenylalanine Hydroxylase)

  • reference structure of PAH: 2PAH (96,41% identity)
  • identical sequence with filled binding site: 1LRM (--> pdb entry: looked at 3D structure and saw a filled binding site, two ligands: FE and HBI)
  • identical sequence with unfilled binding site: not found anyone
  • low sequence identity: 3LUY (32,2% - no pdb ID under 30%)
  • high sequence identity: pdb ID: 2PHM (89,7%)
  • CAT: 1J8U (CATH Code: 1.10.800.10) - there is no other category than 1.10.800.10 for CAT
  • CA: 2B5U (CATH Code: 1.10.287.620)
  • C: 3BQO (CATH Code: 1.25.40.210)
  • other CATH category: 1V8H (CATH Code: 2.60.40.10)

Pymol

...

LGA

LGA ...

SSAP / CATHEDRAL (used by CATH)

SSAP ...
uses Cβ

TopMatch

TopMatch ...
uses Cα

SAP or CE

SAP? ->Error!
->
CE
CE-PDB ...

Modelling scores

To compare the different models, the RMSDs (root-mean-square deviation) are compared. In TopMatch the same formular is taken but called Er (root-mean-square error). The RMSD gives the squared distance between corresponding positions of two superimposed proteins in Ångström. The results are shown in <xr id="rmsd"/>. <figtable id="rmsd">

RMSD results
Method 1lrm 3luy 2phm 1j8u 2b5u 3bqo 1vh8
LGA-RMSD 0.81 3.30 0.88 0.73 3.07 3.59 3.42
SSAP-RMSD 0.99 18.77 1.24 1.02 39.16 22.39 7.27
TopMatch-Er 0.60 1.98 0.81 0.63 1.21 1.12 3.25
CE-RMSD 0.65 5.13 0.95 0.68 4.06 4.68 5.92
Root-mean-square deviation/error in Ångström for the four protein structure alignment predictors LGA, SSAP, TopMatch and CE.

</figtable>

  • lowest RMSDs: TopMatch
  • LGA and CE sometimes the one sometimes the other is better. For very similar structures CE better, otherwise LGA???
  • worst/highest RMSDs: SSAP, maybe the Cβ are more distant???


  • careful about the sidechains: here always 2pah.A as query is taken and xx.A as target

...

Evaluate sequence alignments

Lab journal
<figtable id="model_rmsd">

LGA and hhsearch results
LGA hhsearch
pdb RMSD LGA_S LGA_Q seq_id probability e-value identities(%)
1phz 0.83 90.65 32.44 99.34 100.00 6.9e-165 92
1j8u 0.73 90.29 35.83 99.67 100.00 3.1e-135 100
2v27 1.70 62.77 12.55 96.02 100.00 3.6e-74 32
2qmx 3.18 7.46 1.25 4.88 98.20 1.1e-09 36
3luy 2.82 7.17 1.24 13.89 98.07 3.3e-09 22
1qey 0.64 3.65 1.63 0.00 54.00 3.4 67
1wyp 2.67 8.43 1.37 0.00 29.42 15 19
1a6s 3.15 6.93 1.08 11.43 20.59 29 36
...

</figtable>

  • last two have a very low probability...

References

<references/>