Difference between revisions of "Predicting the Effect of SNPs (PKU)"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Investigated SNPS)
(Investigated SNPS)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
== Investigated SNPS ==
 
== Investigated SNPS ==
 
In the following section, we present the information we gathered for each SNP individually. Summary comments on the methods we used, we placed at subsites. These include the
 
In the following section, we present the information we gathered for each SNP individually. Summary comments on the methods we used, we placed at subsites. These include the
[[PsiBlast in Big80 (PKU)|PsiBlast Profile]] of our protein, [[PsiPred of Mutated PAH|PsiPred Predictions]] of the mutated sequences, the complete [[Multiple Alignment Mammalian PheOH|Alignment of 22 mammalian homologs to PAH]] and the [[SNP effect predictions (PKU)|SIFT, PolyPhen and SNAP predictions]].
+
[[PsiBlast in Big80 (PKU)|PsiBlast Profile]] of our protein, [[PsiPred of Mutated PAH|PsiPred Predictions]] of the mutated sequences, the complete [[Multiple Alignment Mammalian PheOH|Alignment of 22 mammalian homologs to PAH]] and the [[SNP effect predictions (PKU)|SIFT, PolyPhen and SNAP predictions]], but the interesting parts are repeated below.
   
 
===GLU76GLY===
 
===GLU76GLY===
Line 31: Line 31:
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.18.
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.18.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.007 (sensitivity: 0.97; specificity: 0.46)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.007 (sensitivity: 0.97; specificity: 0.46)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)
   
 
Prediction:[[File:approved.jpg|100px|]]
 
Prediction:[[File:approved.jpg|100px|]]
Line 51: Line 52:
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.54.
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.54.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.094 (sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.68)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.094 (sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.68)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)
   
   
Line 72: Line 74:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (high reliability)
   
 
Prediction: [[File:rejected.jpg|100px]]
 
Prediction: [[File:rejected.jpg|100px]]
Line 103: Line 106:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.03.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.03.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.170 (sensitivity: 0.89; specificity: 0.72)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.170 (sensitivity: 0.89; specificity: 0.72)
  +
*SNAP: Neutral (high reliability)
   
   
Line 137: Line 141:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (medium reliability)
   
   
Line 150: Line 155:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)
   
   
Line 163: Line 169:
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.06.
 
*SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.06.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.081 (sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.67)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.081 (sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.67)
  +
*SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)
   
   
Line 176: Line 183:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.01.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.01.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.707 (sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.85)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.707 (sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.85)
  +
*SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)
   
 
[[File:Pymol_322_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated glycine at residue 322 in PheOH. There is only one rotamer and there can not be collisions with neighbouring residues as glycine is the smallest amino acid.]]
 
[[File:Pymol_322_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated glycine at residue 322 in PheOH. There is only one rotamer and there can not be collisions with neighbouring residues as glycine is the smallest amino acid.]]
Line 188: Line 196:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.597 (sensitivity: 0.81; specificity: 0.83)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.597 (sensitivity: 0.81; specificity: 0.83)
  +
*SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)
   
 
[[File:Pymol_337_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated valine at residue 337 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.9% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.]]
 
[[File:Pymol_337_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated valine at residue 337 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.9% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.]]
Line 199: Line 208:
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 0.999 (sensitivity: 0.09; specificity: 0.99)
 
*PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 0.999 (sensitivity: 0.09; specificity: 0.99)
  +
*SNAP: Non-neutral (medium reliability)
   
 
[[File:Pymol_408_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated tryptophan at residue 408 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.3% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.]]
 
[[File:Pymol_408_close.png|200px|thumb|right|Close-up of the mutated tryptophan at residue 408 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.3% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.]]

Revision as of 12:36, 16 June 2012

Short Introduction

This week's task builds on the data gathered last week. We blindly choose 5 disease causing and 5 harmless SNPs and will try to predict their effect from the sequence change alone. You may find a detailed task description at the usual place and consult our task journal.

Our dataset

we propose the following dataset:

  • GLU76GLY
  • SER87ARG
  • ARG158GLN
  • GLN172HIS
  • ARG243GLN
  • LEU255SER
  • MET276VAL
  • ALA322GLY
  • GLY337VAL
  • ARG408TRP

You could check them, if you like.. I put them together 5 minutes ago and already forgot, which are which. ;-)

Investigated SNPS

In the following section, we present the information we gathered for each SNP individually. Summary comments on the methods we used, we placed at subsites. These include the PsiBlast Profile of our protein, PsiPred Predictions of the mutated sequences, the complete Alignment of 22 mammalian homologs to PAH and the SIFT, PolyPhen and SNAP predictions, but the interesting parts are repeated below.

GLU76GLY

As this mutation results in a change from glutamic acid to glycine which have some differences in structure as can bee seen in <xr id="fig:mutationGLUGLY"/> we expect this change to be of rather minor effect. Of course glutamic acid is charged under biological conditions and glycine is not, but glycine could be a universal substitution, because it is neither hydrophobic nor hydrophilic. Additionally, as it is the smallest amino acid, it can not produce any sterical problems. Of course it might be that the glycine can not stabilize any structure, which should be present at this residue.We do not have any structural data for this point, but predictions suggest a position either in a helix or at the edge of a sheet structure. We only can rely on the physiochemical properties, for which we would say, that these changes are not drastic enough to cause the disease. If the mutation would have occurred rather near the catalytic site, our judgment would have been different with respect to the strong affinity of glutamic acid to ions, which plays a major role in PheOH-activity.

  • Keychanges: [From negativly charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic, medium sized to neutral, non-polar, non-hydrophilic, small]
  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: -2(-4,+6)/9 (0,12)/4 (0,9865)
  • SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.18.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.007 (sensitivity: 0.97; specificity: 0.46)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)

Prediction:Approved.jpg <figure id="fig:mutationGLUGLY">

Aminoacids in the first mutation

</figure>

2D structure projection of glutamic acid with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature









2D structure projection of glycine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature


SER87ARG

we expect that this mutation, which causes a change from serine to arginine, has a bigger effect on the protein, than the one above. With this mutation the strength of the effect depends completely on the location of the amino acid. Both of the amino acids are hydrophilic, but as arginine is one of the snorkeling, because of its rather hydrophobic stem, the changes can be rather serious(<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"/>). It is predicted to be two positions N-terminal of a helix structure. As the overall change of size and the change in polarity from rather negative to positive and regarding the fact, that arginine is a rather seldom used amino acid (mostly appearing in the catalytic domain for phosphorylated substrates), we would say, that this is rather a disease causing mutation.

  • Keychanges: [From neutral, polar, slightly hydrophilic to pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic]
  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 1(-3,+4)/11 (1,10(sic!))/6 (1,9840)
  • SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.54.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.094 (sensitivity: 0.91; specificity: 0.68)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)


Prediction Rejected.jpg <figure id="fig:mutationSERARG">

Aminoacids in the second mutation

</figure>










2D structure projection of serine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature
2D structure projection of arginine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature


ARG158GLN

From the secondary structure of both amino acids (<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"/> left side), one would guess, that if an Arginine fits in this region, a Glutamine will fit there as well. But if one looks at the right side of this figure, in the close-up there are some small red discs, which indicate sterical collisions. These are due to the additional hydroxl-group, where the original amino acid only had hydrogen-atoms. Depending on the importance of this site and the collision's this mutation can have almost no or a very big effect. But since the sidechain collides in the inside of the protein, we would predict a rather serious effect.

  • Keychanges: [From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic]
  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 1(-3,+5)/5 (1,17)/9 (0,9913)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (high reliability)

Prediction: Rejected.jpg <figure id="fig:mutationSERARG">

Aminoacids in the third mutation

</figure>

2D structure projection of Arginine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature





2D structure projection of Glutamine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature
Close-up of the mutated Glutamine at residue 158 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighboring residues. This rotamer appears in 1.7% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated Glutamine at residue 158 in PheOH. The residue is located in a helix region.


GLN172HIS

This mutation is rather easy on the first sight. The general chemical properties are the same. The aminoacids only differ in size and structure. As one can see in <xr id="mutationGLNHIS"/> on the right, there are some collisions with the structure. But due to the fact, that this amino acid is located on the outside of the protein and also located in a coiled region which only interferes with another coiled region, we are quite sure, that this mutation is not disease causing.

  • Keychanges: [From neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic, ring-structure]
  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 0(-3,+5)/7 (0,10)/23 (0,9876)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.03.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.170 (sensitivity: 0.89; specificity: 0.72)
  • SNAP: Neutral (high reliability)


Prediction: Approved.jpg <figure id="mutationGLNHIS">

Aminoacids in the fourth mutation

</figure>

2D structure projection of glutamine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature


2D structure projection of histidine with the pK-values for each group. For a better referability the c-atoms are labeled according to the common nomenclature
Close-up of the mutated histidine at residue 172 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighboring residues. This rotamer appears in 18.9% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated histidine at residue 172 in PheOH. The residue is located in a coil region.


ARG243GLN

From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 1(-3,+5)/5 (1,17)/9 (0,9913)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (medium reliability)


Close-up of the mutated histidine at residue 243 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 17.3% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated glutamine at residue 243 in PheOH. The residue is located in a sheet region.

LEU255SER

From neutral, non polar, strongly hydrophobic to neutral, polar, slightly hydrophilic.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: -2(-4,+4)/4 (1,34)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 1.000 (sensitivity: 0.00; specificity: 1.00)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (low reliability)


Close-up of the mutated serine at residue 255 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 42.9% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated serine at residue 255 in PheOH. The residue is located in a helix structure.

MET276VAL

From neutral, non-polar, hydrophobic to neutral, non-polar, strongly hydrophobic.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 1(-3,+5)/2 (0,6)/4 (0,9874)
  • SIFT: TOLERATED with a score of 0.06.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): BENIGN 0.081 (sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.67)
  • SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)


Close-up of the mutated valine at residue 276 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 94.5% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated valine at residue 276 in PheOH. The residue is located in a coil.

ALA322GLY

From neutral, non-polar, hydrophobic, small to neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, small.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: 0(-3,+4)/12 (2,13)/21 (0,9876)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.01.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.707 (sensitivity: 0.78; specificity: 0.85)
  • SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)
Close-up of the mutated glycine at residue 322 in PheOH. There is only one rotamer and there can not be collisions with neighbouring residues as glycine is the smallest amino acid.
Mutated glycine at residue 322 in PheOH. The residue is located in a helix region.

GLY337VAL

From neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, small to neutral, non-polar, strongly hydrophobic, medium sized.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: -3(-4,+6)/4 (0,27)/5 (0,9935)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): POSSIBLY DAMAGING 0.597 (sensitivity: 0.81; specificity: 0.83)
  • SNAP: Neutral (low reliability)
Close-up of the mutated valine at residue 337 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.9% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated valine at residue 337 in PheOH. The residue is located in a loop between two sheet elements.

ARG408TRP

From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic, medium sized to neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, large.

  • BLOSUM62/PAM250/PAM1: -3(-3,+5)/2 (1,17)/ 2 (0, 9913)
  • SIFT: AFFECT PROTEIN FUNCTION with a score of 0.00.
  • PolyPhen (HumVar): PROBABLY DAMAGING 0.999 (sensitivity: 0.09; specificity: 0.99)
  • SNAP: Non-neutral (medium reliability)
Close-up of the mutated tryptophan at residue 408 in PheOH. The best fitting rotamer was chosen to minimize severe or smaller collisions (red to green discs) with neighbouring residues. This rotamer appears in 2.3% of mutations according to the PyMol rotamer database.
Mutated tryptophan at residue 408 in PheOH. The residue is located in a coil near a helix region.

References

A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins.