Difference between revisions of "Predicting the Effect of SNPs (PKU)"
(→ARG158GLN) |
(→ARG158GLN) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
===ARG158GLN=== |
===ARG158GLN=== |
||
− | From the secondary structure of both amino acids (<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"> left side), one would guess, that if an [http://www.biology.arizona.edu/biochemistry/problem_sets/aa/Arginine.html Arginine] fits in this region, a Glutamine will fit there as well. But if one looks at the right side of this figure, in the close-up there are some small red discs, which indicate sterical collisions. These are due to the additional hydroxl-group, where the original amino acid only had hydrogen-atoms. Depending on the importance of this site and the collision's this mutation can have almost no or a very big effect. But since the sidechain collides in the inside of the protein, we would predict a rather serious effect. This idea is getting supported by the information from the PyMol database that this changes is not observed very often, in spite of the rather similar structure of the two amino acids. |
+ | From the secondary structure of both amino acids (<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"/> left side), one would guess, that if an [http://www.biology.arizona.edu/biochemistry/problem_sets/aa/Arginine.html Arginine] fits in this region, a Glutamine will fit there as well. But if one looks at the right side of this figure, in the close-up there are some small red discs, which indicate sterical collisions. These are due to the additional hydroxl-group, where the original amino acid only had hydrogen-atoms. Depending on the importance of this site and the collision's this mutation can have almost no or a very big effect. But since the sidechain collides in the inside of the protein, we would predict a rather serious effect. This idea is getting supported by the information from the PyMol database that this changes is not observed very often, in spite of the rather similar structure of the two amino acids. |
*Keychanges: [From ''pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic'' '''to''' ''neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic''] |
*Keychanges: [From ''pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic'' '''to''' ''neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic''] |
||
Prediction: [[File:rejected.jpg|100px]] |
Prediction: [[File:rejected.jpg|100px]] |
Revision as of 13:31, 14 June 2012
Contents
Short Introduction
This week's task builds on the data gathered last week. We blindly choose 5 disease causing and 5 harmless SNPs and will try to predict their effect from the sequence change alone. You may find a detailed task description at the usual place and consult our task journal.
Our dataset
we propose the following dataset:
- GLU76GLY
- SER87ARG
- GLN172HIS
- ARG158GLN
- ARG243GLN
- LEU255SER
- MET276VAL
- ALA322GLY
- GLY337VAL
- ARG408TRP
You could check them, if you like.. I put them together 5 minutes ago and already forgot, which are which. ;-)
Investigated SNPS
GLU76GLY
As this mutation results in a change from Glutamic acid to Glycine which have some differences in structure as can bee seen in <xr id="fig:mutationGLUGLY"/> we expect this change to be of rather minor effect. Of course Glutamic acid is charged under biological conditions and Glycine is not, but Glycine is kind of a universal substitution, because it is neither hydrophobic nor hydrophilic. Additionally, as it is the smallest amino acid, it can not produce any sterical problems. Of course it might be that the Glycine can not stabilize any structure, which should be present at this residue, but as we do not have any structural data for this point we only can rely on the physiochemical properties, for which we would say, that these changes are not drastic enough to cause the disease. If the mutation would have occurred rather near the catalytic site, our judgment would have been different as for the strong affinity, of Glutamic acid, to ions, which play a major role in PheOH-activity
- Keychanges: [From negativly charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic, medium sized to neutral, non-polar, non-hydrophilic, small]
Prediction: <figure id="fig:mutationGLUGLY">
</figure>
SER87ARG
we expect that this mutation, which causes a change from Serine to Arginine, has a bigger effect on the protein, than the one above. With this mutation the strength of the effect depends completely on the location of the aminoacid. Both of the amino acids are hydrophilic, but as Arginine is one of the snorkeling, because of its rather hydrophobic stem, the changes can be rather serious(<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"/>). As the overall change of size and the change in polarity from rather negative to positive and regarding the fact, that arginine is a rather seldom (mostly in the catalytic domain for phosphorylated substrates )used amino acid, we would say, that this is rather a disease causing mutation.
- Keychanges: [From neutral, polar, slightly hydrophilic to pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic]
Prediction <figure id="fig:mutationSERARG">
</figure>
ARG158GLN
From the secondary structure of both amino acids (<xr id="fig:mutationSERARG"/> left side), one would guess, that if an Arginine fits in this region, a Glutamine will fit there as well. But if one looks at the right side of this figure, in the close-up there are some small red discs, which indicate sterical collisions. These are due to the additional hydroxl-group, where the original amino acid only had hydrogen-atoms. Depending on the importance of this site and the collision's this mutation can have almost no or a very big effect. But since the sidechain collides in the inside of the protein, we would predict a rather serious effect. This idea is getting supported by the information from the PyMol database that this changes is not observed very often, in spite of the rather similar structure of the two amino acids.
- Keychanges: [From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic]
Prediction: <figure id="fig:mutationSERARG">
</figure>
GLN172HIS
From neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic, ring-structure
ARG243GLN
From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic to neutral, polar, strongly hydrophilic.
LEU255SER
From neutral, non polar, strongly hydrophobic to neutral, polar, slightly hydrophilic.
MET276VAL
From neutral, non-polar, hydrophobic to neutral, non-polar, strongly hydrophobic.
ALA322GLY
From neutral, non-polar, hydrophobic, small to neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, small.
GLY337VAL
From neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, small to neutral, non-polar, strongly hydrophobic, medium sized.
ARG408TRP
From pos. charged, polar, strongly hydrophilic, medium sized to neutral, non-polar, slightly hydrophilic, large.
References
A helix propensity scale based on experimental studies of peptides and proteins.