Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-based predictions (PKU)"
From Bioinformatikpedia
(→criticism) |
(→positive feedback) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==positive feedback== |
==positive feedback== |
||
<!-- tell us what you like here --> |
<!-- tell us what you like here --> |
||
+ | |||
+ | * The calculated scores e.g. for the secondary structure prediction are very helpful to asses the performance of the methods. The scores are additionally well displayed. |
||
+ | |||
+ | *Altogether the wiki entry is very interesting and nice to read. |
||
==suggestions== |
==suggestions== |
Revision as of 21:18, 21 May 2012
This is just a place to add criticism and or positive feedback so we Jonathan and Sebastian have a possibility to improve. Please note, that we wont be able to adress all matters immediately but we will address them eventually!
We also want to mention our slogan for this current teamwork
criticism
- There are several typos and some spelling mistakes still in the text, e.g. reagions, ver (instead of very), cant, ties, tree (instead of three) ... and so on. I found myself almost correcting some of those ;)
GOpet section
- The link within the table does not work, and the link in the text above is labelled gene-ontology.com although it is really AmiGO http://amigo.geneontology.org/cgi-bin/amigo/gp-assoc.cgi?gp=UniProtKB:P00439
- You state that 7 of the predicted annotations are found within the 10 from AmiGO .... but I can not reproduce this (e.g. 0003824 is not in there). The AmiGO GO terms should not be viewed as an gold standard anyway.
positive feedback
- The calculated scores e.g. for the secondary structure prediction are very helpful to asses the performance of the methods. The scores are additionally well displayed.
- Altogether the wiki entry is very interesting and nice to read.