Difference between revisions of "Talk:Canavan Task 2 - Sequence alignments"

From Bioinformatikpedia
m (Created page with "* Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. ~~~~")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. [[User:Andrea|andrea]] 10:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 
* Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. [[User:Andrea|andrea]] 10:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Review==
  +
<!-- es ist schon spaet also falls ich was uebersehe und es falsch korrigiere tuts mir sehr leid ..... jonas falls du n mist von mir siehst bitte loeschen :)-->
  +
  +
* Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all
  +
* Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and i think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits.
  +
*You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's.
  +
  +
* I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??.
  +
* Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but again there could be more evaluation
  +
  +
I could not really rethink your approach in detail as it is already late, but your worked very effitiently.
  +
Best, Alice

Revision as of 00:36, 8 May 2012

  • Your PSI-Blast search seems to have hit the reporting limits. Please increase the cutoffs, so you can really compare the results. andrea 10:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Review

  • Some figures are not referenced properly in the text, tables are not referenced or mentioned at all
  • Your cutoff for the blast searches seems very low, and i think you didn't increase the number of results like andrea wrote. My guess is that you consequently can not really compare the number of hits.
  • You could elaborate a little bit more, e.g. on the MSA's.
  • I like your figures, very nice, just get rid of the ??.
  • Making the link to 3D structure is very interesting but again there could be more evaluation

I could not really rethink your approach in detail as it is already late, but your worked very effitiently. Best, Alice