Difference between revisions of "Prediction of Disordered Regions"
(Created page with "== Disopred == Disopred predicts two disordered regions in our protein. The first region is at the beginning of the protein (first two residues) and the second region is at the e…") |
(→IUPred (short)) |
||
Line 221: | Line 221: | ||
As you can see in the picture, IUPred which is focus on short disordered regions found only at the beginning and at the end of the protein a disordered region. This may be wrong, because at the beginning and at the end there are often regions without defined secondary structure, but also without function. |
As you can see in the picture, IUPred which is focus on short disordered regions found only at the beginning and at the end of the protein a disordered region. This may be wrong, because at the beginning and at the end there are often regions without defined secondary structure, but also without function. |
||
<br><br> |
<br><br> |
||
− | + | === IUPred (long) === |
|
Next we take a look to the prediction of the long disordered regions:<br> |
Next we take a look to the prediction of the long disordered regions:<br> |
||
Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
The picture above shows the result of this prediction. There is no disordered region predicted, not even at the beginning or at the end of the protein. This prediction is quite good, because the HEXA_HUMAN protein does not posses any disordered regions. |
The picture above shows the result of this prediction. There is no disordered region predicted, not even at the beginning or at the end of the protein. This prediction is quite good, because the HEXA_HUMAN protein does not posses any disordered regions. |
||
− | |||
=== IUPred (with structural information) === |
=== IUPred (with structural information) === |
Revision as of 14:19, 11 August 2011
Contents
Disopred
Disopred predicts two disordered regions in our protein. The first region is at the beginning of the protein (first two residues) and the second region is at the end (last three regions). This prediction is wrong, because it is normal, that the electrons from the first and the last amino acids lack in the electron density map. So, our protein Hexosamidase A has no disordered regions.
POODLE
We decided to test several POODLE variants and to compare the results.
POODLE-I
POODLE-I predicted five disordered regions:
start position | end position | length |
1 | 2 | 2 |
14 | 19 | 6 |
83 | 89 | 7 |
105 | 109 | 5 |
527 | 529 | 3 |
POODLE-L
POODLE-L found no disordered regions. Therefore, there is no disordered region with a length more than 40aa in our protein.
POODLE-S (High B-factor residues)
This POODLE-S variant searches for high B-factor values in the crystallography, which implies uncertainty in the assignment of the atom positions.
POODLE-S predicted five disordered regions:
start position | end position | length |
0 | 2 | 2 |
13 | 19 | 7 |
83 | 88 | 6 |
105 | 109 | 5 |
526 | 529 | 4 |
POODLE-S (missing residues)
POODLE-S (missing residues) predicts a disordered region, if there is an amino acid in the sequence record, but not on the electron density map.
Poodle-S found 6 disordered regions.
start position | end position | length |
17 | 18 | 2 |
53 | 61 | 9 |
78 | 109 | 33 |
153 | 153 | 1 |
280 | 280 | 1 |
345 | 345 | 1 |
Graphical Output:
Comparison of the different POODLE variants
POODLE-L doesn't find any disordered regions. This is the result we expected, because our protein doesn't posses any disordered regions.
Both POODLE-S variants found several short disordered regions, which is a false positive result. Interesstingly, there seems to be more missing electrons in the electron density map, than residues with high B-factor value.
POODLE-I found the same result as POODLE-S with high B-factor, which was expected, because POODLE-I combines POODLE-L and POODLE-S (high B-factor).
Therefore, the predictions of short disordered regions are wrong results. Only the prediction of POODLE-L is correct.
In general, these predictions are used, if nothing is known about the protein. Therefore, normally we don't know, that the prediction is wrong. Because of that, we want to trust the result and we want to check if the disordered regions overlap with the functionally important residues, because it seems that disordered regions are functionally very important. We check this for POODLE-S with missing residues and POODLE-I, because POODLE-S with high B-factor values shows the same result as POODLE-I.
functional residues | disordered | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
residue position | amino acid | function | POODLE-S (missing) | POODLE-I |
323 | E | active site | ordered | ordered |
115 | N | Glycolysation | ordered | ordered |
157 | N | Glycolysation | ordered | ordered |
259 | N | Glycolysation | ordered | ordered |
58 (connected with 104) | C | Disulfide bond | disordered | ordered |
104 (connected with 58) | C | Disulfide bond | disordered | ordered |
277 (connected with 328) | C | Disulfide bond | ordered | ordered |
328 (connected with 277) | C | Disulfide bond | ordered | ordered |
505 (connected with 522) | C | Disulfide bond | ordered | ordered |
522 (connected with 505) | C | Disulfide bond | ordered | ordered |
As you can see in the table above, only one disulfide bond is located in a disordered region, all other functionally important residues are located in ordered regions. This is a further good hint, that the predictions are wrong.
IUPred
We tested the three different IUPred variants, which are offered by the webserver.
IUPred (short)
As you can see in the picture, IUPred which is focus on short disordered regions found only at the beginning and at the end of the protein a disordered region. This may be wrong, because at the beginning and at the end there are often regions without defined secondary structure, but also without function.
IUPred (long)
Next we take a look to the prediction of the long disordered regions:
The picture above shows the result of this prediction. There is no disordered region predicted, not even at the beginning or at the end of the protein. This prediction is quite good, because the HEXA_HUMAN protein does not posses any disordered regions.
IUPred (with structural information)
As last, we analysed the prediction of IUPred with the additional usage of structural information.
As before, the method did not find any disordered regions. Therefore, the method predict three times the right result. Only by the method with focus on short disordered regions was a prediction of two disordered regions, but these regions were located at the beginning and at the end of the protein, which is obviously wrong.
Meta-Disorder
Meta-Disorder did not predict any disordered region in our protein. The different methods of which Meta-Disorder consists predicted some disordered regions, but Meta-Disorder build the consensus over all of these methods, and therefore it did not predict any disordered regions.
Graphical representation of the result:
The result is very good, because HEXA_HUMAN does not have any disordered regions. Therefore, the prediction of Meta-Disorder is right.