Difference between revisions of "Task homologyModelling 2011"

From Bioinformatikpedia
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
** < 40% sequence identity (ideally go towards 20%)
 
** < 40% sequence identity (ideally go towards 20%)
 
* If possible (i.e. if there are structures at that level of sequence identity) create models with Modeller (command line), Swissmodel and iTasser (online) using one template from each of the groups.
 
* If possible (i.e. if there are structures at that level of sequence identity) create models with Modeller (command line), Swissmodel and iTasser (online) using one template from each of the groups.
  +
* You can find a basic tutorial on all necessary steps using Modeller for this task [[Using Modeller for TASK 4 | here]].
 
** Use the default settings of the methods, i.e. use the standard workflow and directly feed the alignments to the modelling step
 
** Use the default settings of the methods, i.e. use the standard workflow and directly feed the alignments to the modelling step
 
** ''In addition:'' Have a look at the alignments you use for modelling.
 
** ''In addition:'' Have a look at the alignments you use for modelling.

Latest revision as of 13:31, 29 March 2012

For the sequences used in this practical, protein structures have been determined. However, in real-life projects, you often do not have structures. Therefore, we will use structure prediction methods to predict the 3D structures of our sequences. We will also check whether and how the SNPs change the predicted structures.

Theoretical background talks

We will be looking at two parts of homology modelling (-> two talks)

Please include these programs in your talks

  • HHpred
  • Swissmodel
  • Modeller
  • iTasser

The talks should cover

  • how the methods work behind the scenes,
  • some information on their performance, strengths and weaknesses (as e.g. seen in CASP),
  • a brief intro into how to call them and where to find documentation,
  • some discussion how to evaluate the resulting models

Calculation of models

  • Get an overview of available homologous structures based on the sequence searches and alignments.
    • Use HHsearch to check whether you can extend your list towards more remotely similar structures
  • Divide your homologous structures into groups at
    • > 60% sequence identity
    • > 40% sequence identity
    • < 40% sequence identity (ideally go towards 20%)
  • If possible (i.e. if there are structures at that level of sequence identity) create models with Modeller (command line), Swissmodel and iTasser (online) using one template from each of the groups.
  • You can find a basic tutorial on all necessary steps using Modeller for this task here.
    • Use the default settings of the methods, i.e. use the standard workflow and directly feed the alignments to the modelling step
    • In addition: Have a look at the alignments you use for modelling.
      • Collect sequence-based information (important residues, sequence family profiles, secondary structure prediction, etc.) to check the alignment.
      • Edit the alignment.
      • Then, proceed with modelling.
      • Document what you changed and why.
    • In addition: For modelling with Modeller: Use more than one template in one modelling step (if possible due to availability of templates).
  • Feed your 5 (subjectively best) models into 3D-Jigsaw to get out recombined, optimised (?) models. (Do this separately for the different categories of templates.)

Now, you should have quite a large number of models.

Evaluate your models

  • Check the numeric evaluation of your models (scores given by the modelling programs)
  • Compare the models to the experimental structure (Select one apo and one complex structure if there are several experimental structures, document your choice of reference)
    • Calculate the TM score of the models (use TMscore or TMS in /apps/bin/).
    • Calculate the C_alpha RMSD of the models (use SAP in /apps/bin/).
    • Extra diligence task: define a radius of 6 Angstrom around the catalytic centre and calculate the all atom RMSD in that region
  • Discuss your results:
    • Is any method systematically better at predicting the structure?
    • Does this depend on the similarity of the template?
    • Does refining the models by hand help?