Difference between revisions of "Lab journal task 5"

From Bioinformatikpedia
(Created page with "We used the structure of 1A6Z chain A as target. The templates were selected based on the structures assembled for task 4 and also the Blast alignment from task 2. -selection of…")
 
(Modeller)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
We used the structure of 1A6Z chain A as target. The templates were selected based on the structures assembled for task 4 and also the Blast alignment from task 2.
+
We used the structure of 1A6Z chain A as target. The templates were selected based on the structures assembled for task 4 and also the Blast alignment from task 2. Unfortunatels, we could not find a sequence with a higher sequence identity than 39%.
   
 
-selection of template structures
 
-selection of template structures
Line 6: Line 6:
 
-creation of alignments: sdt and 2d
 
-creation of alignments: sdt and 2d
   
  +
The RMSD and GDT score were calculated with TM scoring function of the [http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/TM-score/ Zhang lab]. The function was downloaded and executed with:
- computation of TM score: how did we calculate id? where is the programm from, how did we use it? Why did we use TM instead of GDT?
 
  +
TMscore model.pdb 1a6z_a.pdb
- computation of RMSD: how?
 
  +
We then extracted the RMSD and GDT_TS score from the output. The GDT score is given as value between 0 and 1.
  +
  +
We searched the Blast hits from task 2 to create sets with close and distant homology. We could not find a structure with a higher sequence identity than 39%.
  +
  +
- computation of MSA: how?
  +
  +
==Swiss-Model ==
  +
  +
Swiss-Model was executed online and the 'Automatic Modelling Mode' was used. In the advanced options, we specified the different templates.
  +
  +
== I-Tasser ==
  +
  +
I-Tasser was also used from the web interface. Option I was used to specify a specific template and Option II was used for the low sequence similarity group to exclude sequences with over 30% identity.

Latest revision as of 19:07, 27 August 2013

We used the structure of 1A6Z chain A as target. The templates were selected based on the structures assembled for task 4 and also the Blast alignment from task 2. Unfortunatels, we could not find a sequence with a higher sequence identity than 39%.

-selection of template structures

Modeller

-creation of alignments: sdt and 2d

The RMSD and GDT score were calculated with TM scoring function of the Zhang lab. The function was downloaded and executed with:

TMscore model.pdb 1a6z_a.pdb

We then extracted the RMSD and GDT_TS score from the output. The GDT score is given as value between 0 and 1.

We searched the Blast hits from task 2 to create sets with close and distant homology. We could not find a structure with a higher sequence identity than 39%.

- computation of MSA: how?

Swiss-Model

Swiss-Model was executed online and the 'Automatic Modelling Mode' was used. In the advanced options, we specified the different templates.

I-Tasser

I-Tasser was also used from the web interface. Option I was used to specify a specific template and Option II was used for the low sequence similarity group to exclude sequences with over 30% identity.