Difference between revisions of "Talk:Homology modelling TSD"
From Bioinformatikpedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
So, just a formal note for the moment. Someone taught me that captions go below figures, but for tables, it has to be above. I do not have a good reference for that, the best one I could find is [http://monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/science/process/2.1.xml this] in Section Labelling. [[User:Staniewski|Staniewski]] 14:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
So, just a formal note for the moment. Someone taught me that captions go below figures, but for tables, it has to be above. I do not have a good reference for that, the best one I could find is [http://monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/writing/science/process/2.1.xml this] in Section Labelling. [[User:Staniewski|Staniewski]] 14:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
* Iv'e never seen it anywhere ... I prefer the LaTeX style but I'll look around for more information on that |
* Iv'e never seen it anywhere ... I prefer the LaTeX style but I'll look around for more information on that |
||
| + | * Thinking about it, you might be right. The Latex package booktabs which is meant for more professional looking tables also puts them on top -jonas |
||
<br><br> |
<br><br> |
||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
*As usual there are only very tiny things to "criticise" |
*As usual there are only very tiny things to "criticise" |
||
**What does 1."> above the figures mean? I know that it links to the picture, but it rather looks like a wrong tag or something |
**What does 1."> above the figures mean? I know that it links to the picture, but it rather looks like a wrong tag or something |
||
| − | ***It appears as soon as you use the Cross-Reference module inside a 'caption' environment. I didn't find a fix for this yet. (I could of course just hardcode the numbering ;)) |
+ | ***It appears as soon as you use the Cross-Reference module inside a 'caption' environment. I didn't find a fix for this yet. (I could of course just hardcode the numbering ;)) -jonas |
I really like your modelling approach that is based on the different alignments. The whole process of choosing different targets and change things looks very well elaborate. |
I really like your modelling approach that is based on the different alignments. The whole process of choosing different targets and change things looks very well elaborate. |
||
Revision as of 23:44, 4 June 2012
Unfortunately we are not ready yet :)
So, just a formal note for the moment. Someone taught me that captions go below figures, but for tables, it has to be above. I do not have a good reference for that, the best one I could find is this in Section Labelling. Staniewski 14:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Iv'e never seen it anywhere ... I prefer the LaTeX style but I'll look around for more information on that
- Thinking about it, you might be right. The Latex package booktabs which is meant for more professional looking tables also puts them on top -jonas
Take your time... ;)
Just some notes for now:
- As usual there are only very tiny things to "criticise"
- What does 1."> above the figures mean? I know that it links to the picture, but it rather looks like a wrong tag or something
- It appears as soon as you use the Cross-Reference module inside a 'caption' environment. I didn't find a fix for this yet. (I could of course just hardcode the numbering ;)) -jonas
- What does 1."> above the figures mean? I know that it links to the picture, but it rather looks like a wrong tag or something
I really like your modelling approach that is based on the different alignments. The whole process of choosing different targets and change things looks very well elaborate. --Rackersederj 14:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
