Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sequence-based predictions TSD"
From Bioinformatikpedia
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
just ckecking out your page. In "DSSP and handling of differing sequences" your refer to "both these tools" to me it looks like you only refer to SIFTS, so i dont quite understand the plural. |
just ckecking out your page. In "DSSP and handling of differing sequences" your refer to "both these tools" to me it looks like you only refer to SIFTS, so i dont quite understand the plural. |
||
--[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 05:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
--[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 05:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | ** I was referring to SIFTS and the mapping in the mmCIF files provided by PDB. The latter is hardly a 'tool' and I hope I made that clearer in the text now |
||
I liked that you outsourced all not necessary information, like parser details to a protocol page. That really helps keep the text more readable. --[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 05:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
I liked that you outsourced all not necessary information, like parser details to a protocol page. That really helps keep the text more readable. --[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 05:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | ** Thanks :) |
||
"Comparison of predictions and annotation" |
"Comparison of predictions and annotation" |
||
"long time, do not penalize" I think there is a 'we' missing after the comma. --[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 06:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
"long time, do not penalize" I think there is a 'we' missing after the comma. --[[User:Wagnerr|Wagnerr]] 06:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
| + | ** This is correct, albeit the sentence might be a bit long. Just leave out some of the stuff in commas and you get: ''Owing to this problem, scores used to assess the performance of transmembrane helix prediction [...] do not penalize a prediction that is not 100% aligned with the 3D annotation[...]'' |
||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 22 May 2012
Hi, just ckecking out your page. In "DSSP and handling of differing sequences" your refer to "both these tools" to me it looks like you only refer to SIFTS, so i dont quite understand the plural. --Wagnerr 05:49, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- I was referring to SIFTS and the mapping in the mmCIF files provided by PDB. The latter is hardly a 'tool' and I hope I made that clearer in the text now
I liked that you outsourced all not necessary information, like parser details to a protocol page. That really helps keep the text more readable. --Wagnerr 05:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :)
"Comparison of predictions and annotation" "long time, do not penalize" I think there is a 'we' missing after the comma. --Wagnerr 06:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- This is correct, albeit the sentence might be a bit long. Just leave out some of the stuff in commas and you get: Owing to this problem, scores used to assess the performance of transmembrane helix prediction [...] do not penalize a prediction that is not 100% aligned with the 3D annotation[...]
